Backbone of the Americas—Patagonia to Alaska, (3–7 April 2006)
Paper No. 6-14
Presentation Time: 10:35 AM-7:45 PM

A GEOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE TO SOME BASALTIC AND SILICIC MAGMA INTERACTIONS IN ARC RELATED ASSOCIATIONS

POMA, Stella, Department of Geological Sciences, University of Buenos Aires, Ciudad Universitaria - Pabellón II, Buenos Aires, 1428, Argentina, stella@gl.fcen.uba.ar and QUENARDELLE, Sonia, Ciencias Geológicas, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Cs Exactas y Naturales, Ciudad Universitaria, Pab II, Buenos Aires, 1428, Argentina

Common features observed in a number of Lower Paleozoic arc related magmatic rocks help to interpret the environment and emplacement mechanism of their parental magmas. The analyzed rocks are part of the Western Puna Eruptive Belt and Western Pampean Ranges —Sierra de Los Llanos, Igneous Chepes Complex in Central and Northwestern Argentine. Mineralogy, textures, and space relationships between granites and diorites/gabbros, either as marginal phases or enclaves of the latter in the more sialic components show the simultaneous presence of two melts: a mafic one and above it a granitic one. As the melting of mantle rocks in the arc wedge progress, small volumes of basaltic magma lodge in temporary magmatic chambers at the base of the crust. Heating of the overlying crust also produce melting: at deep crustal levels limited interaction between these two kinds of magmas are produced. Blending between both melts can generate homogeneous and hybrid magmas. Moreover, as seen in related field relationships big volumes of hybridization are not expected. They can only grow small bodies.

In the same way, limited geochemical and isotopic exchange between melts is expected. In crustal settings the scenery is a little different. It is improbable that the basaltic magma intrude into a silicic one because both melts have different densities and rheologies. But the heat transfer is the essential energy to keep the silicic magmas melted and potentially to move upwards. The basaltic magma is in a dynamic differentiation process; and continuously receives new batches of melt. Colder, highly viscous and less dense than basaltic ones, silicic magmas pond over the mafic ones. Field relations strongly suggest that mafic magma could only move upwards at the border of silicic magmatic chambers. There is no easy way for the mafic magma to intrude a less dense and highly viscous melt, except in peripherical places. Petrographical evidence suggest that basic magma was chilled in contact with colder melt and built irregularly shaped or pillowy structured of basic magma in hybridized melt or granitoid compositions. The principal process is the mechanical mixing of both melts.

Backbone of the Americas—Patagonia to Alaska, (3–7 April 2006)
General Information for this Meeting
Session No. 6
T5. Processes, Comparisons and Other Cordilleran Issues II: Paleozoic to Early Mesozoic Continental Margin Tectonics
Congress & Exhibition Center: Foyer and Auditorio Bustelo
10:35 AM-7:45 PM, Monday, 3 April 2006

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Speciality Meeting No. 2, p. 76

© Copyright The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.