| Paper No. 69-0 | ||
| A SIMPLE MODEL OF FRACTURED AQUIFER PERMEABILITY | ||
|
HALIHAN, Todd1, MACE, Robert E.2, MARRETT, Randall A.3, SHARP, John M.4, and SIMMS, Alexander R.1, (1) School of Geology, Oklahoma State Univ, 105 NRC, Stillwater, OK 74078, halihan@okstate.edu, (2) Texas Water Development Board, P.O. Box 13231, Austin, TX 78711, (3) Univ Texas - Austin, Dept Geological Sciences, C1140, Austin, TX 78712-1101, (4) Univ Texas - Austin, Dept Geological Sciences, C1100, Austin, TX 78712-1101 Fractured aquifer permeability is often characterized using the concept of a representative elementary volume, normally considered to be 100 cubic meters or more in fractured aquifers. However, a well-known issue in these aquifers is an apparent increase in aquifer permeability with scale or the “scale effect”. A simple model of fractured aquifer permeability was tested that uses distributed apertures instead of assuming equal apertures. The model was tested against core, well, and regional model permeability data from the San Antonio segment of the Edwards aquifer. Using outcrop aperture data, the model reproduced the well and regional scale permeability values that vary by ten orders of magnitude. The model also suggests that the “scale effect” can be fully explained as an effect of selective sampling of a fractured aquifer. The model indicates that a representative elementary volume for the Edwards aquifer may not exist or is much larger than 4 kilometers. The modeling also shows the truncations apparent in fracture aperture distribution data are apparent in well and regional model distributions. This suggests that while a “scale effect” may exist in permeability data, using fracture aperture distributions may be a more consistent tool for evaluating these aquifers. | ||
|
GSA Annual Meeting, November 5-8, 2001
General Information for this Meeting | ||
| Session No. 69 Flow and Transport in Fractured Aquifers—From Field Characterization to Model Construction Hynes Convention Center: Ballroom A 8:00 AM-12:00 PM, Tuesday, November 6, 2001 | ||
© Copyright 2001 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions. | ||