| Paper No. 135-0 | ||
| DEPOSITIONAL HISTORY OF MIDDLE CAMBRIAN OF INDIAN HIGH HIMALAYAS: TECTONIC AND PALEOGEOGRAPHIC IMPLICATIONS | ||
|
HUGHES, Nigel C., Univ California - Riverside, 1432 Geology Bldg, Riverside, CA 92521-0423, nigel.hughes@ucr.edu, MYROW, Paul M., Geology, The Colorado College, Colorado Springs, CO 80903, THOMPSON, Karl R., Colorado College, 14 E Cache La Poudre St, Colorado Springs, CO 80903-3243, WILLIAMS, Ian S., Australian National Univ, Research School Earth Sciences, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia, PAULSEN, Tim, Geology, Univ of Wisconsin, Oshkosh, Oshkosh, WI 54901, and PARCHA, S. K., Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, Dehra Dun, 248001, India The Middle Cambrian Kunzum La Formation consists of over 1,300 m of dominantly siliclastic deltaic deposits in the Spiti Valley region of the Indian High (Tethyan) Himalayas. The formation ranges from the lowermost Middle (Maochuangian Stage) Cambrian to middle Middle Cambrian (Hsuchuangian Stage). It is dominated by large-scale shoaling cycles that range from storm-influenced shelf deposits to thick trough cross-bedded fluvial facies. The fluvial deposits are in cases overlain by thin carbonate beds with abundant trilobite fossils. These beds, which are scattered throughout the formation, represent the initial transgressive deposits of these cycles and their bases are marine flooding surfaces. Relative sea level rises may have been triggered by large-scale avulsion of river channels, and falls by reduction in sedimentary input associated with avulsion along with continued regional subsidence due in part to sediment loading. Paleocurrents for the Kunzum La Formation are generally towards the north-northeast for both marine and fluvial facies, which suggests that the hinterland was towards the south. High Himalayan strata are generally reconstructed as distal equivalents of Lesser Himalayan passive margin deposits. Detrital zircon age data from nearly age equivalent strata from each area reveal similar age populations, but show differences in population abundances and degree of maturity of zircon grains. Palinspastic reconstruction of these regions is difficult because of uncertainty of Cenozoic fault displacements. Thick deltaic deposits of the Kunzum La Formation are difficult to reconcile as distal equivalents of the Lesser Himalayas without considerable spatial changes in source terranes and shoreline progradation. The Cental and High Himalayan rocks could alternatively represent a separate basin that was juxtaposed with India during the early Paleozoic. There is, however, no structural evidence in the form of folds or microstructures to support Neoproterozoic to lowermost Paleozoic orogenesis. | ||
|
GSA Annual Meeting, November 5-8, 2001
General Information for this Meeting | ||
| Session No. 135 Stratigraphy III: Phanerozoic Sequence Stratigraphy Hynes Convention Center: 202 1:30 PM-5:30 PM, Wednesday, November 7, 2001 | ||
© Copyright 2001 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions. | ||