| Paper No. 37-0 | ||
| IMPLICATIONS OF MASS-INDEPENDENT FRACTIONATIONS FOR THE EARTH'S EARLY SULFUR CYCLE | ||
|
FARQUHAR, James1, WING, Boswell2, HU, Guixing3, RUMBLE, Douglas III3, KAUFMAN, Alan J.4, and VARNI, M.4, (1) Department of Geology and Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center, Univ of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, jfarquha@essic.umd.edu, (2) Dept. of Geology and ESSIC, Univ. Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, wing@essic.umd.edu, (3) Geophysical Lab, Carnegie Institution of Washington, 5251 Broad Branch Road, Washington, DC 20015, (4) Dept. Geol, Univ. Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 Sulfur isotope measurements for a variety of different types of Archean samples reveal mass-independent compositions that are absent in the recent rock record. These anomalous compositions are interpreted to reflect the influence of atmospheric photochemistry on the Archean sulfur cycle. The implications for the Archean Earth are three-fold. Archean atmospheric conditions (UV transmission, oxidation state, composition) enabled the source photochemical reactions to occur; The Archean atmospheric environment permitted transfer this mass-independent signature to Earth's surface; and Oxidative weathering and biological activity did not homogenize the signature once it was imparted to the surface sulfur cycle. Our analyses to date indicate a range of D33S values (+3.5 to -1.3 ‰). These analyses show that the anomalous signature is widespread and of global significance. We have identified a possible source reaction (deep-ultraviolet photolysis of sulfur dioxide). The occurrence of this reaction, the transfer of its signature to the surface, and the preservation of this signature in the Archean rock record imply much lower oxygen contents - an upper limit of at most, a few percent of that in the present atmosphere. All barite analyzed to date has negative D33S. Much of this barite has been suggested to be of hydrothermal origin, but the negative D33S precludes a magmatic source of sulfate, leading to the suggestion that sulfate derives from surficial sources (possibly oceanic). (Negative D33S sulfate is also generated by deep UV photolysis of SO2.) The alternative to an oceanic source is the possibility that the sulfur in barite reflects incorporation of locally-derived atmospheric sulfate rather than the global oceanic signature. Resolution of this question may come from analysis of trace sulfate in carbonates. | ||
|
GSA Annual Meeting, November 5-8, 2001
General Information for this Meeting | ||
| Session No. 37 Sulfur Cycling in Precambrian to Recent Ocean-Atmosphere Systems: A Session Honoring the Career of William T. Holser Hynes Convention Center: 102 1:30 PM-5:30 PM, Monday, November 5, 2001 | ||
© Copyright 2001 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions. | ||