| Paper No. 2-0 | ||
| BASALT-RELATED FE-OXIDE(±CU-AG-CO-AU) SYSTEMS: THE HUMBOLDT MAFIC COMPLEX EXAMPLE, WESTERN US | ||
|
JOHNSON, David A. and BARTON, Mark D., Center for Mineral Resources, Dept. of Geosciences, Univ. of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, djohnson@geo.arizona.edu Numerous Fe-oxide(±Cu-Ag-Co-Au) occurrences within the Humboldt mafic complex, western Nevada, are part of a belt of Jurassic Fe-oxide-rich mineralization associated with arc and back-arc-related mafic to felsic magmatism in western N. America. This and many other basalt-related systems worldwide share key features with Fe-oxide(-Cu-Au) deposits associated with intermediate and felsic rocks. A full understanding of this family of deposits must account for this compositional spectrum. The Humboldt mafic is a large (~2500 km3) volcano-plutonic complex and consists of several gabbroic centers that feed overlying basalts and intrude an evaporite-bearing clastic and carbonate sequence. Roughly 2/3 of these rocks are pervasively altered to sodic-calcic and sodic assemblages. These zone from deep high-temperature Na-scap + hbl + titan ± mt assemblages (200 km3) centered on dike swarms to shallow, lower temperature alb + chl + carb ± hem ± Cu(Fe)-sulfide assemblages (450 km3). Fe±Cu mineralization is similarly zoned from deeper mt + apat + hbl + titan -bearing replacements, veins and breccias, to shallower hem(mt) ± py ± cpy ± bn veins and breccia bodies associated with alb and ± carb assemblages. The Humboldt occurrences resemble other mafic-hosted global occurrences and together these deposits represent an end-member in the Fe-oxide(-Cu-Au) family of deposits. Geologic settings vary globally and include rift-basins, flood basalts, and volcanic arcs. Other mafic-associated examples include deposits in the eastern US, Siberia, and China, with modern analogues in the Salton Sea and Danakil Depression. Most districts share voluminous alkali-rich alteration (Na-Ca, Na, K) and enormous amounts of metal movement which may represent significant economic targets. Both barren and mineralized systems are known; however, many of the latter are poorly documented. Mafic-hosted hydrothermal systems contrast with intermediate- to felsic-hosted systems mainly in having common high-T scap alteration, higher mt to hem ratios, and abundant Co-bearing phases. With some exceptions, qtz, F-rich minerals, REE, and U are rarer in mafic-hosted systems. These differences follow from differences in igneous compositions. The mafic-hosted end-members represent the best evidence for derivation from an external brine source. | ||
|
GSA Annual Meeting, November 5-8, 2001
General Information for this Meeting | ||
| Session No. 2 SEG Special Session II: Iron-Oxide(-Copper-Gold) Systems—Deposit Studies to Global Context Hynes Convention Center: 302 1:30 PM-5:30 PM, Sunday, November 4, 2001 | ||
© Copyright 2001 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions. | ||