| Paper No. 156-0 | ||
| ONTOGENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY DYNAMICS OF SHAPE DISPARITY IN THE TRILOBITE PHACOPS | ||
|
KAPLAN, Peter, Department of Geological Sciences and Museum of Paleontology, Univ of Michigan, 1109 Geddes Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, pefty@aya.yale.edu, ZELDITCH, Miriam L., Museum of Paleontology, Univ of Michigan, 1109 Geddes Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, and SHEETS, H. David, Canisius College, 2001 Main St, Buffalo, NY 14208-1035 Patterns of morphological diversity ("disparity") are traditionally described from adult morphologies. Adding an ontogenetic dimension to such analyses can take us beyond describing patterns to explaining them. Such explanations require comparative studies of ontogeny. These comparisons tell us which ontogenetic parameters differ, but they lack explicit information about disparity. In particular, these studies fail to identify the ways in which ontogenetic differences affect disparity patterns. By bringing together studies of disparity and of comparative ontogeny, we hope to explore more substantively the contribution of ontogenetic change to patterns of disparity. Here we examine the ontogenetic dynamics of shape disparity in light of evolutionary changes in ontogeny of shape in the trilobite Phacops. To analyze the ontogenetic dynamics of disparity, we compare the magnitude and structure of shape disparity at two points in holaspide ontogeny. These observed ontogenetic changes in disparity are then compared to expectations under hypothetical models, in which particular sets of developmental variables are constrained to be equal among taxa. Preliminary analyses of five Phacops species and subspecies suggests that disparity increases dramatically over holaspide ontogeny. Disparity of adults appears to be due largely to two types of modifications of ontogeny: allometric repatterning and changes in developmental rate. Analyzing the two component subclades reveals strikingly different patterns. In one, disparity is relatively modest, and does not increase significantly over growth; in the other, disparity is substantial at both stages, and increases markedly through ontogeny. Differential behavior of these two subclades suggests that the dynamics of one subclade drive the dynamics of the larger clade. Such differences provide evidence for a strong role for development in structuring changes in disparity in evolving lineages. | ||
|
GSA Annual Meeting, November 5-8, 2001
General Information for this Meeting | ||
| Session No. 156 Marine Invertebrate Paleontology III Hynes Convention Center: 102 8:00 AM-12:00 PM, Thursday, November 8, 2001 | ||
© Copyright 2001 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions. | ||