| AN AVERAGE WATERVILLE FORMATION PSEUDOSECTION: PREDICTED PHASE COMPOSITIONS AND COMPARISON TO GARNET-BIOTITE THERMOMETRY | ||
|
TINKHAM, Douglas Keith1, ZULUAGA, C. A., and STOWELL, H. H., (1) Dept. of Geological Sciences, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487-0338, tinkh001@bama.ua.edu An average Bt-zone pelite composition for the Waterville Formation, Maine, was used to construct a P-T pseudosection in the MnNaCaKFMASH system using thermodynamic data of Holland & Powell (1998). Predicted Grt, Ms, Bt, and St compositions are discussed, followed by a comparison of Grt-Bt thermometry for aluminumsilicate-bearing samples to the pseudosection Grt-in line and the And-Sil boundary. Pelitic assemblages of the Waterville Formation define Bt, Grt, St-And, and Sil isograds with increasing T developed at 3-4 kilobars (Ferry, 1980). Pseudosection topologies at these P-T conditions consist of 3 dominant assemblages: Bt-Chl-Ms-Pl-Qtz (AS1), Grt-Bt-Chl-Ms-Pl-Qtz (AS2), and Grt-Bt-Ms-Pl-Sill-Qtz (AS3). As generally observed in nature, Bt octahedral Al and Fe/(Fe+Mg) increases with temperature in all 3 assemblages at constant P, while Grt Fe/(Fe+Mg) decreases with increasing T in AS2 and 3. With increasing T, the phengite component and K/(K+Na) of Ms decreases in AS1 and 2, while in AS3 the Al content remains relatively constant, Fe content decreases, and Mg and K/(K+Na) increases for Ms. As previously reported, Fe-Mg partitioning between St and Grt predicted by the Holland and Powell thermodynamic data is opposite to that typically observed in nature. The pseudosection predicts St to have a higher Fe/(Fe+Mg) ratio than Grt, contrary to what is observed in the analyses of Ferry (1980), suggesting a problem in the relative thermodynamic properties of Grt and St, or the spurious effect of non-system components (e.g., Zn in St) on partitioning. Utilizing activity models used in pseudosection construction, Grt-Bt thermometry was applied to And and Sil bearing samples using compositions reported in Ferry (1980). Temperatures calculated for And- and Sil-bearing samples plot in the And and Sil stability fields, respectively, of Holland & Powell (1998). However, many temperatures calculated for And bearing samples actually lie at T’s below the predicted Grt-in line. This discrepancy is likely due to either variation in bulk-rock compositions (especially Mn), or problems with thermodynamic data and activity models. | ||
|
Northeastern Section - 36th Annual Meeting (March 12-14, 2001)
| ||
| Session No. 38--Booth# 19 Igneous and Metamorphic Petrology (Posters) Sheraton Burlington: Lake Champlain Exhibition Hall 8:30 AM-12:00 PM, Wednesday, March 14, 2001 | ||
© Copyright 2001 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions. | ||