| USE OF PSEUDOSECTIONS FOR PREDICTING METAMORPHIC MINERAL ASSEMBLAGES IN PELITIC ROCKS: EXAMPLES FOR AN AVERAGE PELITE | ||
|
STOWELL, Harold H., TINKHAM, Doug K., and ZULUAGA, Carlos A., Geological Sciences, Univ of Alabama, Box 870338, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487-0338, hstowell@wgs.geo.ua.edu MnNaCaKFMASH pseudosections, constructed for pelite compositions are useful for predicting metamorphic mineral assemblages and reaction history. Pseudosections were constructed using THERMOCALC (Powell & Holland, 1988) and thermodynamic data of Holland & Powell (1998). Activity models are from Holland & Powell (1998) and THERMOCALC models extended for Mn. Three pseudosections were constructed: I) average biotite zone pelite composition from the Waterville Formation Maine, II) #I with Al2O3 concentration increased from 16.88 to 19.65%, and III) #I with K2O concentration decreased from 3.7 to 2%. Pseudosection mineral assemblages mostly agree with nature; however, naturally occurring staurolite+cordierite and staurolite+andalusite are not predicted by pseudosections. This may result from modeled Al concentrations and/or Mg/(Fe+Mg). Higher Al and lower Mg/(Fe+Mg) would favor staurolite+andalusite; however, higher Al and higher Mg/(Fe+Mg) would favor cordierite stability. Higher Mg and Al could move a bulk composition to the Mg side of the staurolite-cordierite tie-line in AFM space (Pattison et al., 1999); therefore, allowing the possibility of a staurolite+cordierite+aluminum silicate field. However, our pseudosection prediction of no staurolite+cordierite stability is compatible with a 'polymetamorphic' interpretation of this assemblage (Pattison et al., 1999). Pseudosection I predicts zoisite at T <425°C @ 3.3 kbar and <525°C @ 7 kbar. Garnet forms at 450-460°C above 5 kbar and would grow with pronounced decrease in Ca after consumption of zoisite along an isobaric heating path. Positive slope of the zoisite-out reaction and predicted garnet zonation is in agreement with observations made in calcic pelites from Vermont (Menard & Spear, 1993) and southeastern Alaska (Stowell & Menard, 1996). Aluminum silicate minerals are stable at T >540°C @ 2.5 kbar and T >600°C @ 7 kbar. Therefore, andalusite+sillimanite+kyanite would not be stable. This prediction is in agreement with KFMASH phase equilibria (Pattison, 1997) and observations from natural assemblages (Larson & Sharp, 2000). Increased Al (e.g., Pseudo II) shifts aluminum silicate-in reactions to lower T and may stabilize andalusite+sillimanite+kyanite at very high Al concentrations. | ||
|
Southeastern Section - 50th Annual Meeting (April 5-6, 2001)
| ||
| Session No. 3--Booth# 16 Petrology, Mineralogy, and Economic Geology (Posters) Sheraton Capital Center Hotel: Oak Forest Ballroom 8:00 AM-12:00 PM, Thursday, April 5, 2001 | ||
© Copyright 2001 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions. | ||