Paper No. 112-13
Presentation Time: 4:45 PM-5:00 PM
VISCOUS LAYER MODEL FOR A FAULT-PROPAGATION FOLD
PATTON, Thomas L., BP Exploration, Chertsey Road, Sunbury on Thames, TW16 7LN, United Kingdom, pattontl@bp.com and FLETCHER, R.C., Department of Geological Sciences, Univ of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0399

Fault propagation is explicitly added to the viscous layer model for deformation above a fault cutting rigid blocks [Patton & Fletcher, 1998; Johnson and Johnson, 2001]. As in the trishear model, discrete domains in which the velocity field is prescribed or determined move through the rock volume as the fault tip propagates. A horizontal plane pinned to the fault tip divides the volume in two such domains. In the lower domain, the velocity field is a prescribed continuous field corresponding to block motion accommodated by shear on a narrow shear zone whose width and dip are specified. The velocity field in the upper domain is that determined in a viscous fluid layer for the prescribed basal velocity and conditions of zero traction at its upper surface. Material rising through the horizontal domain boundary becomes part of the viscous layer; material falling below this surface participates in the prescribed rigid block/shear zone velocity field. Deformation and structural form is obtained by integration over a prescribed program of propagation to slip ratio (P/S). The fault-tip stress distribution may be explicitly evaluated in the viscous layer, and used in an empirical model to interpret P/S in natural or model structures. This hybrid kinematic-mechanical model has the unsatisfactory elements of kinematic and some mechanical models of so-called fault-propagation folds: (i) an ad hoc definition of “rigid” and deformable regions; (ii) lack of attention to the large-scale deformation which determines fault slip and propagation, of which the region of the fold and fault tip is a small part; and (iii) an assumption of constant rheological behavior, despite large inhomogeneous deformation. With these caveats, the model structures provide useful insight into effects of fault zone dip, P/S, and anisotropy on structural form, the role of the free surface on deformation as the fault propagates, and the interpretation of small-scale brittle features that can be associated with the stress distribution. RCF was supported by NSF OPP-9815160.

2002 Denver Annual Meeting (October 27-30, 2002)
Session No. 112
Forward Modeling in Tectonics and Structural Geology
Colorado Convention Center: C207
1:30 PM-5:30 PM, Monday, October 28, 2002
 

© Copyright 2002 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.