| Paper No. 204-6 | ||
| Presentation Time: 9:40 AM-10:00 AM | ||
| CHESAPEAKE BAY IMPACT CRATER: PETROGRAPHIC AND GEOCHEMICAL INVESTIGATIONS OF THE IMPACT BRECCIA FILL | ||
|
REIMOLD, Wolf Uwe, School of Geosciences, Univ of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag 3, PO Wits, Johannesburg, 2050, South Africa, 065wur@cosmos.wits.ac.za, KOEBERL, Christian, Institute of Geochemistry, Univ of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, Vienna, A-1090, Austria, and POAG, C. Wylie, US Geol Survey, 384 Woods Hole Rd, Woods Hole, MA 02543-1598 The Chesapeake Bay impact structure is, at 85 km diameter, one of the largest known impact structures on Earth. Its importance stems from the facts that it is the only fully marine impact structure that has been extensively studied, by both reflection seismic surveys and drilling. This impact event took place at 35.7 Ma, and has been related to one of the two late Eocene microtektite strewnfields. In addition, this impact structure is of major environmental importance - with regard to both hydrogeology and neotectonics – to millions of inhabitants of the eastern seaboard of the United States. The excellent state of analysis of this very large, complex impact structure has contributed essential knowledge about impacts into the marine realm. A first petrographic and geochemical study of samples from the impact breccia fill, the so-called Exmore breccia (imaged on seismic profiles in the environs of the central uplift with a maximum thickness of 1.2 km), showed that the breccia is composed of a range of clastic components (the various pre-impact sediments and crystalline granitoid basement) set into fine-grained clastic matrix of the same components. Shocked clasts are very rare; observed shock effects include shock fracturing in quartz, PDFs in both quartz and feldspar, rare impact melt and glass fragments, and rare and scattered occurence of impact glass spherules (proximal [!] microtektites). Co-existence of these shocked particles with other minerals demonstrates that most of the particles with shock deformation are derived from crystalline basement. U-stage analysis of crystallographic orientations of PDFs as well as relative frequencies of PDFs per grain indicate that most particles with this shock effect were deformed at 10-20 GPa. XRF and INA analysis of clasts and breccia samples shows that the felsic sediments of the Potomac, Aquia, Nanjemoy, and Piney Point Formations provided most of the breccia material. This and the granitoid basement seem to be the only significant contributing components. Our siderophile element and Ir analysis did not show any trace of a meteoritic component in Exmore breccia. | ||
|
2002 Denver Annual Meeting (October 27-30, 2002)
| ||
| Session No. 204 Chesapeake Bay Impact Structure: Geology, Geophysics, and Geohydrology of America's Largest Crater Colorado Convention Center: Ballroom 4 8:00 AM-12:00 PM, Wednesday, October 30, 2002 | ||
© Copyright 2002 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions. | ||