Paper No. 181-2
Presentation Time: 1:45 PM-2:00 PM
LARAMIDE RANGE MORPHOLOGY AND GEOMORPHIC IMPLICATIONS
SAFRAN, Elizabeth B.1, GILBERT, Graham J.1, ANDERSON, Robert S.2, RIIHIMAKI, Catherine2, and ZELLERS, Niels A.1, (1) Environmental Studies, Lewis and Clark College, 0615 SW Palatine Hill Rd, Portland, OR 97219, safran@lclark.edu, (2) Earth Sciences, Univ of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064

Researchers of the Laramide ranges have long noted the mountains' distinctive topographic features, including "subsummit" surfaces of low local relief, steep-walled canyons dissecting such surfaces, and high-standing bedrock summit spines. The nature and distribution of these features have important implications for interpretations of regional geologic history. For example, one argument for the origin of subsummit surfaces asserts that they reflect long periods of elevated local base level, when the sediment fill surfaces in range-adjacent basins were relatively stable and higher than today's. If this hypothesis is true, one might expect subsummit surfaces in ranges bordering a particular intermontane basin to express a common range of elevations. If, on the other hand, subsummit surfaces reflect Cenozoic tectonic uplift of formerly low elevation surfaces, as early Laramide workers argued, no such relationship would be expected. A systematic, regional scale analysis of Laramide range topography is required to address questions like these. We have launched such an analysis, focusing on the Bighorn, Wind River, Medicine Bow, Laramie, Front, Black Hill, and Uinta Ranges. Using 30 m USGS digital elevation models, we initially focus on: 1) identification and mapping of subsummit surfaces; and 2) documentation of longitudinal stream profile morphology of range-draining rivers, since the latter forms an important link between basin exhumation history and montane morphologic evolution. Analyses of range hypsometry, range-perpendicular topographic swaths, and stream profiles show that most Laramide ranges exhibit morphologic asymmetry. This assymmetry apparently does not systematically reflect range-scale structural features and may instead reflect the geomorphic history of the adjacent basins.

2002 Denver Annual Meeting (October 27-30, 2002)
Session No. 181
Rocky Mountains IV: Tectonics, Climate Change, and the Late Cenozoic Evolution of the Rocky Mountains, Colorado Plateau, and Western Great Plains
Colorado Convention Center: C108/110/112
1:30 PM-5:30 PM, Tuesday, October 29, 2002
 

© Copyright 2002 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.