| Paper No. 117-7 | ||
| Presentation Time: 8:00 AM-12:00 PM | ||
| PHYTOEXTRACTION: PLANT RESPONSES FROM AN OILSHALE TAILING LANDFILL | ||
|
DING, Aizhong1, DING, Aizhong Sr1, LIU, Puxin2, HAN, Youxiang3, and CARPENTER, Philip4, (1) Chemical and Process Engineering Department, The Sheffield Univ, Mappin Street, Sheffield, S1 3JD, United Kingdom, a.ding@sheffield.ac.uk, (2) Maoming Environmental Protection Bureau, 2 Jiankang Road, Maoming, NB 525000, China, (3) Institute of Environmental Sciences, Beijing Normal Univ, 29 Xinwai Street, Beijing, 100875, China, (4) Dept. of Geology and Environmental Geosciences, Northern Illinois Univ, DeKalb, IL 60115 Phytoremediation is an emerging technology that uses plants to clean up pollutants (metals and organics) from the environment. Within this field of phytoremediation, the utilization of plants to transport and concentrate metals from the soil into the harvestable parts of roots and above-ground shoots is usually called phytoextraction. phytoextraction of metals is a cost-effective approach that uses metal-accumulating plants to clean up these soils. The aim of this work is to assess the performance of phytoextraction at an industrial tailing landfill. The studying area, an oilshale tailing landfill, is located on the outskirts of Maoming, a new energy industrial city, south of China. The waste consists of processed oil shale and various chemical wastes generated from the Petrochemical Company. The landfill is 6-7 km long, about 2-3 km wide and 15 to 20 m high. Plant and soil samples were collected at different parts of the site, along the top-hillside-bottom-vicinity of the landfill and analyzed for metals such as Zn, Cu, Ni, Cr, Pb, Sr with ICP-MS. The analytical results showed that: (1) the soil beneath and near the landfill was contaminated by heavy metals, Mn concentration is as high as 2655µg/g,Fe as high as 53190µg/g, Rb as high as 506.8ug/g; (2) the same plant has different metal-accumulating capacities at its different parts, for example, Eucalytus saligna has Mn-accumulating factors of 20 for flower, 9 for stem and 5 for fruit; (3) the plants have higher accumulation capacities for Mn, for other metals according to the order Zn£ūNi£ūPr£ūPb; (4) the same plant has different accumulation capacities at different parts of the site, which may be explained by the concentration effect. | ||
|
2002 Denver Annual Meeting (October 27-30, 2002)
| ||
| Session No. 117 Geochemistry (Posters) I Colorado Convention Center: Exhibit Hall 8:00 AM-12:00 PM, Tuesday, October 29, 2002 | ||
© Copyright 2002 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions. | ||