| QUANTITATIVE TESTING OF BEDROCK INCISION MODELS IN A STEADY-STATE DRAINAGE, CLEARWATER RIVER, OLYMPIC MOUNTAINS, WA | ||
|
TOMKIN, Jonathan H.1, BRANDON, Mark1, PAZZAGLIA, Frank J.2, BARBOUR, Jonathan R.1, and WILLETT, Sean D.3, (1) Dept of Geology and Geophysics, Yale Univ, PO Box 208109, New Haven, CT 06520-8109, jonathan.tomkin@yale.edu, (2) Dept. of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Lehigh Univ, 31 Williams Dr, Bethlehem, PA 18015-3188, (3) Univ Washington, PO Box 351310, Seattle, WA 98195-1310 The topographic evolution of many active orogens is thought to be dominated by fluvial incision of bedrock rivers, that is rivers that have channels that are actively cutting into bedrock. Several incision models are based on the concept that incision of a bedrock channel is limited by basal shear stress or stream power. Collectively, these models can be represented by a power-law relationship, E=k S^n A^m, where A is upstream area, S is channel slope, E is incision rate, and k, m, and n are parameters. Specific incision models are distinguished by different predicted values or ranges for the parameters m and n, or by expansion of the equation to account for other processes. We evaluate the current crop of incision models by comparing their predictions with observations obtained from the Clearwater River in the western Olympic Mountain of northwest Washington State. We use long-term incision rates determined for the Clearwater by Pazzaglia and Brandon (2001) from their study of terrace incision over the last ~140 k.y. Those rates, together with long-term erosion rates determined by low-T thermochronometric studies (Brandon et al., 1998; Batt et al., 2001), show that over long time scales (> ~20 kyr.), the drainage has maintained a steady-state form, defined by a local balance between river incision and rock uplift. The incision-rate data allows us, through the use of inversion methods and statistical tests, to directly evaluate the applicability of the different incision models for the Clearwater. We were surprised to find that all models fail to fit the data. Our analysis is particularly striking for the commonly used stream-power model, which gives physically implausible best-fit values for m and n. Attempts to use realistic m and n values results in large systematic misfits. Our conclusion is that current bedrock incision models have not been adequately tested and many of the models may be inappropriate for representing the incision process over long time scales. This is an important issue in that it undermines quantitative modeling of tectonically active landscapes, where realistic representation of the bedrock incision process is critical. | ||
|
Cordilleran Section - 98th Annual Meeting (May 13–15, 2002)
| ||
| Session No. 28 Pattern and Rates of Long-term Deformation across the Washington Segment of the Cascadia Forearc High CH2M Hill Alumni Center: Ballroom 110C 1:30 PM-5:30 PM, Tuesday, May 14, 2002 | ||
© Copyright 2002 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions. | ||