| Paper No. 4-0 | ||
| A COMPARISON OF TWO DIFFERENT AQUIFERS USING A MODULAR THREE DIMENSIONAL FINITE DIFFERENCE GROUNDWATER FLOW MODEL | ||
|
RENWICK, Brad E. and VAN DER HOVEN, Stephen J., Geography-Geology, Illinois State Univ, Campus Box 4400, Normal, IL 61761, berenwi@ilstu.edu The factors governing the groundwater flow in an aquifer can be investigated extensively if comparisons can be made to similar aquifers with slightly different geologic materials. For this study two different aquifers were modeled in similar areas of central Illinois, along the Illinois River in North Pekin and Mississippi Rivers in Pike County. These areas were modeled to investigate the flow dynamics of each and to delineate Wellhead Protection Areas for the Illinois EPA’s Wellhead Protection Area Program. Each area consists of different geologic materials. The North Pekin area is a valley fill aquifer consisting of clean medium-grained sands, the Pike county area is an glacial outwash aquifer made of poorly sorted sands and gravels. However, these materials are close enough in their hydraulic characteristics that comparisons can be made in their flow dynamics. Differences in hydraulic conductivity had the biggest influence on the sensitivity analysis for the North Pekin model, but recharge was the most sensitive to changes in the Pike County model. Changes in bedrock topography and groundwater extraction from the aquifers had little effect on the numerical simulations. The shape of the WHPAs differed in each area, but were both suprisingly small, confirming the influence of the thickness of the aquifers and its hydraulic conductivity. | ||
|
North-Central Section (36th) and Southeastern Section (51st), GSA Joint Annual Meeting (April 3–5, 2002)
| ||
| Session No. 4 Hydrogeology and Environmental Geoscience Hyatt Regency Hotel: Patterson Ballroom A 1:00 PM-5:00 PM, Wednesday, April 3, 2002 | ||
© Copyright 2002 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions. | ||