| APPLICATION OF GEOPHYSICS TO THE STUDY OF FROZEN GROUND IN NORTHERN NEW YORK | ||
|
NORENSKY, Brian1, REVETTA, Frank A.2, and GIRONDA, James1, (1) Geology Department, State Univ of New York College, Pierrepont Avenue, Potsdam, NY 13676, norens54@potsdam.edu, (2) Geology Department, State Univ of New York College at Potsdam, Pierrepont Avenue, Potsdam, NY 13676 Frozen ground conditions in northern New York create environmental problems during the winter. Burials cannot take place because of the frozen ground and the installation of water pipelines must take into account the thickness of the frozen ground. Our approach to the geophysical study was to conduct d.c. resistivity and seismic refraction surveys under frozen ground conditions in the winter and unfrozen ground conditions in the summer. The seismic refraction survey conducted in the summer under unfrozen ground conditions indicated a 3 layer model consisting of 6 feet of low velocity silty sand underlain by a medium velocity clay layer extending to a depth of 40 feet. The third layer of high velocity is the Potsdam sandstone bedrock. Our interest was in the upper low velocity layer of 6 feet thickness where the frozen ground occurs. An electrical resistivity survey conducted by the Wenner method at closely spaced electrode spacings was used to determine the vertical extent and resistivity of the frozen ground. This survey was effective in determining the thickness of 3 feet for the frozen ground and a resistivity of 1000 ohm-meters. Beneath the frozen ground the resistivity decreased to 40 ohm meters. The seismic survey attempted to illustrate the problem of conducting seismic refraction surveys when frozen ground is present to create a low velocity layer beneath the higher velocity frozen ground. An offset of 2 feet and a 2 feet geophone interval enabled us to determine the velocity of frozen ground. By using the additional evidence of 3 feet thickness for frozen ground from the resistivity survey, and velocities V1, V2, V3 and intercept time (Ti) the thickness of the unfrozen low velocity layer was determined. The research indicated a general increase in resistivity and seismic velocity in frozen ground. Also, the resistivity method is effective in determining its thickness. The frozen ground gives rise to the low velocity problem. However, if other geophysical data is available, it is possible to determine thickness of the unfrozen low velocity layer. | ||
|
Northeastern Section - 37th Annual Meeting (March 25-27, 2002)
General Information for this Meeting | ||
| Session No. 23--Booth# 3 Application of Geophysical Techniques (Posters) Sheraton Springfield: Ballroom North 1:00 PM-5:00 PM, Tuesday, March 26, 2002 | ||
© Copyright 2002 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions. | ||