| AN UPTHROWN VALLEY? UNCONVENTIONAL FAULTING IN SEVIER VALLEY, UT | ||
|
CLINE, Eric J., Geology and Geophysics, Univ of Utah, 135 South 1460 East #719, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0111, ecline@mines.utah.edu and BARTLEY, John, Department of Geology and Geophysics, Univ of Utah, 135 S. 1460 E., Rm 719, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Extensional terranes worldwide are characterized by basin-range physiography in which hanging-wall blocks subside to form elongate valleys and footwall blocks are upthrown to form ranges. However, the relation is reversed in Sevier Valley in the central Utah Transition Zone. Sevier Valley lies on the upthrown, topographically low footwall of the valley-forming normal fault, here referred to as the Salina detachment, and the hanging wall block forms the topographically high Wasatch and Sevier plateaus. The reversal of the typical relationship between structure and physiography of an extended terrane reflects effects of the evaporitic, mechanically weak Arapien Shale in the footwall. The standard half-graben extensional fault model assumes a rigid footwall block that limits fault-related deformation to the hanging wall (e.g., rollover anticline). A mechanically weak footwall turns this assumption on its head. The Arapien Shale buoyantly rebounds in response to unroofing by the Salina detachment in a manner reminiscent of a salt dome to form a structural geometry that resembles the "isostatic rolling hinge" fault model proposed to explain metamorphic core complexes. Thus, rather than forming a deep basin on the hanging wall adjacent to a steep fault-bounded footwall high, footwall rebound irons out the exhumed footwall fault surface to form the low-standing low-relief area of Sevier Valley. This structural interpretation has several geomorphic implications. Drainage and sediment-dispersal patterns in the standard model are reversed: sediment transport is dominantly from the hanging wall to the footwall. Footwall topographic relief is subdued compared to more typical normal-fault footwall ranges (e.g., the Wasatch Range). Counterintuitively, surface-rupturing earthquakes should cause localized uplift on the valley side of the fault relative to the hanging-wall range; thus, rather than accentuating gradients of drainages entering the basin, surface rupture should locally decrease gradients at the fault to cause aggradation and ponding of sediment at canyon mouths. | ||
|
Rocky Mountain - 54th Annual Meeting (May 7–9, 2002)
| ||
| Session No. 24 Cenozoic Landscape Evolution of the Colorado Plateau and the Basin-and-Range Transition Zone Sharwan Smith Center: Starlight Room 1:00 PM-5:00 PM, Thursday, May 9, 2002 | ||
© Copyright 2002 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions. | ||