| 2003 Seattle Annual Meeting (November 2–5, 2003) | |
| Paper No. 88-10 | |
| Presentation Time: 8:00 AM-12:00 PM | ||
CATACLASTIC FLOW DURING DEFORMATION IN A FOLD-THRUST BELT | ||
|
ISMAT, Zeshan, Geosciences, Franklin & Marshall College, P.O. Box 3003, Lancaster, PA 17604-3003, zeshan.ismat@fandm.edu. Cataclastic flow (CF) can be broadly defined as a deformation in which fracturing forms clasts that frictionally slide past each other and possibly rotate, resulting in a ductile deformation within the elastico-frictional (EF) regime. In detail there are two distinct types of CF, both of which occur over a wide range of scales and often develop a co-dependent relationship across different scales. Type 1 CF typically forms within discrete zones, such as fault zones. Larger clasts are supported within a matrix of smaller fragments. The clasts progressively decrease in size as cataclasis continues and a foliation may develop in the matrix. The grain size of the larger clasts primarily controls the activity/inactivity and growth of these cataclasite zones. Type 2 CF is not matrix supported and is typically a more distributed deformation. The clasts are bound by a stable network of fractures and deformation zones (DZs). The deformation involves collective movement on a population of fractures and DZs. Clast solid body rotation is very limited. The shape and position of the clasts, rather than clast size, controls the activity/inactivity and size of the area deforming by cataclastic flow. As deformation continues, the clasts begin to define a fabric, similar to a foliation. The Canyon Range syncline, central Utah, Sevier orogenic belt, underwent fold tightening within he EF regime. Several generations of fracture populations and DZs developed from the micro- to the outcrop-scale to accommodate fold tightening. A cooperative relationship exists between the two types of cataclastic flow at two distinct scales: matrix supported at the micro-scale and clast supported at the outcrop-scale. The collective character of the fracture and DZ networks at all scales allows for an overall ductile deformation at the largest scale. | ||
|
2003 Seattle Annual Meeting (November 2–5, 2003)
| ||
| Session No. 88--Booth# 167 Structural Geology (Posters) I: Deformation Processes Washington State Convention and Trade Center: Hall 4-F 8:00 AM-12:00 PM, Monday, November 3, 2003 Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 35, No. 6, September 2003, p. 178 | ||
© Copyright 2003 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions. | ||