2003 Seattle Annual Meeting (November 2–5, 2003)
Paper No. 228-1
Presentation Time: 8:00 AM-12:00 PM

USING SURFACE MAGNETIC PROFILES TO MAP COLUMBIA RIVER BASALT STRATIGRAPHY IN OREGON

MADIN, Ian1, MCCONNELL, Vicki1, and BLAKELY, Richard2, (1) Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries, 800 NE Oregon St # 28, Suite 965, Portland, OR 97232, ian.p.madin@state.or.us, (2) U.S. Geol Survey, 345 Middlefield Road MS 989, Menlo Park, CA 94025

Using Surface Magnetic profiles to map Columbia River Basalt stratigraphy in Oregon. Madin, I. P., Blakely, R.J., and McConnell, V.M.

Magnetic polarity of hand specimens of Columbia River Basalt flows has been used as a field mapping criteria for decades. Collecting magnetic data using a fluxgate magnetomer in the field, however, is time consuming, requires good exposures, is susceptible to scrambling by lightning, and provides only gross polarity information. We are testing the use of detailed, ground-magnetic profiles collected with total field magnetometers to quickly map CRB at or near the topographic surface. Variations in the total field measured close to the surface are strongly influenced by the polarity of the underlying basalt flows, especially when in contact with other lithologies. Total-field measurements may even be sensitive to differences in inclination, declination or strength of magnetization between flows of the same magnetostratigraphic unit. If true, it might be possible to map CRB stratigraphy in areas of poor exposure by collecting detailed surface magnetic profiles. We used a proton precession magnetometer and a cesium-vapor magnetometer, both with GPS navigation, to collect profiles up or down slopes where magnetostratigraphic boundaries had been mapped by previous workers. This allows data to be collected as fast as one can walk. In profiles from a half dozen sites in Eastern and Western Oregon, we generally found strong signals associated with normal-reversed contacts, and also found substantial signal between flows in the same magnetostratigraphic unit. Simple modeling of the magnetic signals expected in crossing polarity contacts on slopes supports the validity of the field method. Further profiling of well-characterized sections is needed to fully develop this tool.

2003 Seattle Annual Meeting (November 2–5, 2003)
Session No. 228--Booth# 144
The Columbia River Flood Basalts: New Insights into the Volcanism, Petrology, and Tectonism of a Large Igneous Province: Dedicated to Peter Hooper on His Retirement (Posters)
Washington State Convention and Trade Center: Hall 4-F
8:00 AM-12:00 PM, Wednesday, November 5, 2003

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 35, No. 6, September 2003, p. 549

© Copyright 2003 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.