| 2003 Seattle Annual Meeting (November 2–5, 2003) | |
| Paper No. 101-1 | |
| Presentation Time: 1:30 PM-1:50 PM | ||
SPATIAL/TEMPORAL VARIATION IN THE BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY | ||
|
REINERS, William A., Wyoming Geographic Information Science Center, Univ of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071-4008, reiners@uwyo.edu. Biotic processes operating over geological time have altered Earth’s chemical environment in profound ways. Biotic creation of a mostly aerobic atmosphere and ocean has altered the redox states of sulfur, iron and many other elements, and made the evolution of large heterotrophs like ourselves possible. These conditions contrast with a chemical environment that would exist through purely physical-chemical processes. The relative strength of geochemical influences increases with volcanic, tectonic, erosion and deposition rates, and with extreme climatic conditions. Biotic functions, in contrast, require specific resources and information. Resources include high-grade energy--primarily light--a relatively narrow range of acceptable temperatures, liquid water, and a sufficient supply of limiting elements. Informational codes are necessary to synthesize biochemical catalysts to drive thermodynamically costly reactions. This information is held in the genetic structure of species and can be locally extinguished. Given the different conditions favoring geochemical versus biotic influences, the relative importance of each to control of local environmental chemistry should vary spatially and temporally in predictable ways. Geochemical control should dominate where geological processes are relatively rapid such as on actively eroding slopes, where temperature and water resources are limiting such as deserts, and where physical transport processes such as running water are relatively energetic. Biotic control, on the other hand, should dominate at biologically congenial ranges of temperature and liquid water availability, where transport processes are weak, and where disturbances have not reduced the biota. Appropriate indices of the relative importance of geochemical versus biotic controls can be generated to test predictions of those controls based on geographic variables of controlling phenomena. A consciousness of scale-dependent, spatially and temporally varying biogeochemical controls will contribute to a better understanding of the limits and mechanisms of environmental stoichiometry. | ||
|
2003 Seattle Annual Meeting (November 2–5, 2003)
| ||
| Session No. 101 Ecological Stoichiometry: Elemental Cycling and Biogeochemical Interactions in Ecosystem Processes Washington State Convention and Trade Center: 400 1:30 PM-5:30 PM, Monday, November 3, 2003 Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 35, No. 6, September 2003, p. 270 | ||
© Copyright 2003 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions. | ||