2003 Seattle Annual Meeting (November 2–5, 2003)
Paper No. 44-10
Presentation Time: 3:15 PM-3:30 PM

USING LASER SCANNING AND DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY TO CHARACTERIZE AND ANALYZE THE MORPHOLOGY OF JOINTS

MYNATT, Ian, BERGBAUER, Stephan, and POLLARD, David D., Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-2115, imynatt@pangea.stanford.edu

Joint surfaces record the propagation history of a mode I fracturing event in the complex and often beautiful morphologies seen upon them. We have combined digital scanning with differential geometry to quantitatively explore the surfaces of two joints with a focus on rib marks and hackle. The laser scanning provided a high-resolution (<0.200 mm accuracy) data set of position vectors for each joint surface. Differential geometry provided the mathematics to quantitatively describe the local shape and orientation of the surface near each data point. A filter based on 2-D Fourier analysis was used to selectively remove designated ranges of wavelengths from the data after re-sampling the surface to a grid using linear interpolation. Two filtering strategies were employed: 1) minimal, to remove only surface “noise” resulting from debris and damage; and 2) maximal, to remove all but the low frequency structures. Residuals of the maximal filtering accentuate minor joint surface features, such as incipient hackle. Curvature of the minimally filtered surfaces was calculated at each grid point using the first and second fundamental forms of differential geometry, supplying the Gaussian and mean curvatures, the principle curvature directions and values, the normal to the surface, and the shape curvature (elliptical, hyperbolic, parabolic or planar). Parabolic and planar shapes are defined by one or both principal curvatures being identically zero, an unlikely occurrence in sampled data, so a method was devised to determine a threshold under which curvatures are assigned a statistically “zero” value. Main joint surfaces were found to be predominantly planar, with local parabolic, hyperbolic and elliptical shapes. Hackle and cross fractures on both sample surfaces have similar shapes despite significant differences in size, with the hackle having smooth planar faces. Rib marks have been described qualitatively in the literature as both cusped and asymmetrical with a convex face in the direction of joint propagation and a concave face nearest the main joint surface. Unlike these shapes, the rib marks examined here have distinct and similar morphologies, with concave bases and convex peaks. This quantitative description of joint surfaces lends insight into the fracturing process.

2003 Seattle Annual Meeting (November 2–5, 2003)
Session No. 44
Structural Geology I: Advances in Rock Mechanics
Washington State Convention and Trade Center: 609
1:00 PM-3:45 PM, Sunday, November 2, 2003

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 35, No. 6, September 2003, p. 112

© Copyright 2003 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.