| 2003 Seattle Annual Meeting (November 2–5, 2003) | |
| Paper No. 224-18 | |
| Presentation Time: 8:00 AM-12:00 PM | ||
PROVENANCE ANALYSIS OF THE LOWER CRETACEOUS COLVILLE FORELAND BASIN; NEW CONSTRAINTS ON THE UNROOFING HISTORY OF THE BROOKS RANGE, NORTHERN ALASKA | ||
|
WARTES, Marwan A. and CARROLL, A.R., Univ Wisconsin - Madison, 1215 W Dayton St, Madison, WI 53706-1692, mwartes@geology.wisc.edu The Fortress Mountain Formation forms a >3000 m clastic wedge along the southern margin of the Colville foreland basin, that has been interpreted to record either the latest contraction of the Brooks Range, or early post-contractional fill of a residual foredeep. Conglomerate clast-counts (~1700 clasts) at Fortress and Castle Mountains document a distinctive erosional history related to unroofing of specific structural levels within the orogen. The lowest conglomerate is dominated by chert and siliceous mudstone clasts but also contains up to 31% mafic to intermediate volcanic clasts, interpreted to derive from the structurally high Copter Peak and Misheguk Mountain allochthons. Chert clasts increase to a maximum of ~90% at the top of the Fortress Mountain and at the base of stratigraphically higher Castle Mountain. Locally enhanced concentrations of distinctive tasmanite clasts indicate erosion of the Ipnavik River allochthon, and the Picnic Creek allochton may also have been eroded at this time. Chert clasts at Castle Mountain then gradually decrease in abundance upward as contributions from lower structural elements (i.e. Endicott Mountains allochthon) increase. Limestone clasts (up to 16%) that contain crinoids and rugose corals mark unroofing of the Lisburne Group. Quartzite clasts, interpreted to represent the underlying Kanayut Conglomerate and associated clastic units, appear next and rapidly replace the limestone. The top of the succession is characterized by an increasing abundance of granitic clasts, (up to19%). Their most likely sources are Devonian plutonic complexes in the core of the Brooks Range, suggesting a large component of vertical uplift. This uplift may be related to large scale coeval(?) extension documented in the hinterland, or to isostatic adjustment of the orogen following detachment of a dense subducting slab. | ||
|
2003 Seattle Annual Meeting (November 2–5, 2003)
| ||
| Session No. 224 Tectonics (Posters) III: Cascades, California, Laramide, and Circum-Pacific Tectonics Washington State Convention and Trade Center: Hall 4-F 8:00 AM-12:00 PM, Wednesday, November 5, 2003 Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 35, No. 6, September 2003, p. 514 | ||
© Copyright 2003 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions. | ||