2003 Seattle Annual Meeting (November 2–5, 2003)
Paper No. 198-1
Presentation Time: 1:30 PM-5:30 PM

CURRENT UNDERSTANDING OF THE RAVEN CANYON FAULT AT YUCCA MOUNTAIN, NEVADA

DRAKE, Ronald M. II1, DICKERSON, Robert P.2, SPENGLER, Richard W.1, and FAUNT, Claudia C.3, (1) U.S. Geol Survey, Denver Federal Center, Box 25046, MS 421, Denver, CO 80225, rmdrake@usgs.gov, (2) S.M.Stoller, 990 S. Public Road, Suite A, Lafayette, CO 80026, (3) U.S. Geol Survey, 5735 Kearny Villa Road, San Diego, 92123

Several lines of evidence, including geophysical data, borehole data, and surface geologic data, are interpreted to indicate an inactive, large, down-to-the-west, buried fault beneath Yucca Mountain, site of a proposed nuclear waste repository. This previously postulated fault, herein referred to as the Raven Canyon fault, may affect current understanding of ground-water flow in the Yucca Mountain area. Gravity data indicate a steep gradient trending from west of the Lathrop Wells Cone northeastward towards the Calico Hills, separating thicker, less dense Tertiary volcanic rocks to the west from more dense Paleozoic rocks to the east. Previous interpretations of borehole data suggest that a tectonic feature was encountered in boreholes at Yucca Mountain that may be related to the Raven Canyon fault. New borehole data in the interpreted hanging wall of the Raven Canyon fault show that the ground-water level is lower than previously expected, indicating that the buried fault may affect ground-water flow in the southern part of Yucca Mountain. Interpretations along geologic cross sections indicate that strata of the Miocene Crater Flat Group thicken in the hanging wall of the buried fault, and that a fault-controlled basin existed there at 13.25 Ma. However, because the thickness of the overlying Miocene Paintbrush Group tuffs remains uniform across the fault, faulting activity apparently ceased by about 12.8 Ma. Surface exposures show a ponded mudflow deposit preserved within Crater Flat Group rocks at Raven Canyon, coincident with the steep gravity gradient in southern Crater Flat. Beneath the mudflow deposit, a buried NE-trending fault scarp is locally observed. The mudflow deposit contains clasts as large as 1 m, indicating that a large topographic gradient (paleo-fault scarp) probably existed at the time of emplacement.

2003 Seattle Annual Meeting (November 2–5, 2003)
Session No. 198
Seismic Hazards and Neotectonics in Southern Nevada (Posters)
Washington State Convention and Trade Center: Hall 4-F
1:30 PM-5:30 PM, Tuesday, November 4, 2003

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 35, No. 6, September 2003, p. 475

© Copyright 2003 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.