| 2003 Seattle Annual Meeting (November 2–5, 2003) | |
| Paper No. 101-12 | |
| Presentation Time: 4:35 PM-4:50 PM | ||
SOURCES, CYCLING, AND RESIDENCE TIMES OF SULFUR IN AN ALPINE BASIN IN THE COLORADO ROCKY MOUNTAINS BASED ON d34SSO4, d18OSO4, AND 35SSO4 | ||
|
CLOW, David W., Water Resources Discipline, U.S. Geol Survey, MS 415 Federal Center, Box 25046, Denver, CO 80225, dwclow@usgs.gov, MAST, M. Alisa, U.S. Geol Survey, Denver, CO 80225, KESTER, Cynthia L., U.S. Geological Survey, Stable Isotope Lab, Mail Stop 963, Denver Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225, and MICHEL, Robert L., United States Geol Survey, Menlo Park, CA d34SSO4, d18OSO4, 35SSO4 and solute chemistry were measured in rain, snow, spring water, and stream water in Loch Vale, an alpine basin in the Colorado Rocky Mountains, during 1999 to investigate sources, cycling, and residence times of sulfur (S). The primary source of S in Loch Vale and many other high-elevation, granitic basins in the Rocky Mountains is atmospheric deposition of SO4. Sulfur mass balance calculations for Loch Vale indicate that S exports exceed S inputs by 20 to 50%, suggesting that sources of S other than atmospheric deposition contribute to stream fluxes of SO4. Pyrite occurs in the bedrock in trace quantities, however, only one specimen has been found in Loch Vale during two decades of study. Another possible source of the “excess” S is a net export of S stored in soils and wetland peat that may have accumulated when SO4 deposition was higher (1960s – 80s) or under different climate conditions. d34SSO4 was used in a binary mixing equation to quantify the proportion of S in spring and stream water derived from atmospheric deposition and from terrestrial sources. The average d34SSO4 of precipitation in Loch Vale is 5.6±1.0‰ (n=15). d34SSO4 was regressed against 1/SO4 and the y-intercept was taken to represent the d34SSO4 of pyrite. Results indicated that 62±16% of annual SO4 flux in the spring and 42±7% of annual SO4 flux in the stream were derived from atmospheric deposition. Regression equations for the spring and stream had y-intercepts of 1.5 and –1.5, respectively. The difference in y-intercepts could be due to differences in d34SSO4 of pyrite in the stream and spring basins, or to differences in the importance of biologically-mediated S cycling. The d18OSO4 of spring and stream waters (-5.0 to 2.1) were substantially lighter than that of atmospheric deposition (13±1‰), consistent with the hypothesis that atmospherically deposited SO4 is biologically cycled and/or mixed with S from mineral weathering. Radiogenic 35SSO4, which is deposited from the atmosphere and has a half-life of 87 days, was used to calculate the fraction of “new” SO4 in spring and stream water. Results indicated that “new” SO4 accounted for 28±7% and 32±8% of annual flux in the spring and stream, respectively. Comparison with d34SSO4 results indicates much of the atmospherically-deposited SO4 is stored in the watershed for more than one year. | ||
|
2003 Seattle Annual Meeting (November 2–5, 2003)
| ||
| Session No. 101 Ecological Stoichiometry: Elemental Cycling and Biogeochemical Interactions in Ecosystem Processes Washington State Convention and Trade Center: 400 1:30 PM-5:30 PM, Monday, November 3, 2003 Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 35, No. 6, September 2003, p. 272 | ||
© Copyright 2003 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions. | ||