2003 Seattle Annual Meeting (November 2–5, 2003)
Paper No. 218-10
Presentation Time: 10:40 AM-11:00 AM

ISOTOPIC STUDIES OF SULFUR-BEARING MINERALS IN THE CLASTS AND MATRIX OF HOLOCENE DEBRIS FLOWS FROM MOUNT RAINIER, WASHINGTON

BREIT, George N.1, RYE, Robert O.2, JOHN, David A.3, KESTER, Cynthia L.2, and BERRY, Cyrus J.1, (1) U.S. Geol Survey, MS-973, Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225, gbreit@usgs.gov, (2) U.S. Geological Survey, Stable Isotope Lab, Mail Stop 963, Denver Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225, (3) US Geol Survey, MS-901, 345 Middlefield Rd, Menlo Park, CA 94025-3561

The isotopic composition of sulfur-bearing minerals in the clasts and matrix of major Holocene lahars (Osceola, Electron, and Paradise) on Mount Rainier was used to estimate conditions of hydrothermal alteration prior to edifice collapse.  Mineral assemblages in the clasts were organized into a sequence of increasingly altered rock: smectite + pyrite alunite + kaolinite ฑ pyrite jarosite gypsum/anhydrite + sulfur.  The relative abundance of clasts with each mineral assemblage decreased as the level of alteration increased.  Water-soluble Fe and Al sulfates occur in the matrix (< 2 mm fraction) along with pyrite, jarosite, and minor alunite.  Elemental sulfur, water-soluble (w.s.) sulfates (gypsum, Fe and Al sulfates), acid-soluble (a.s.) sulfate (jarosite and alunite), and pyrite were extracted sequentially for isotopic analysis using a chemical speciation scheme.

The isotope composition of each sulfur form is consistent among the lahars.  d34Ssulfur (-2 to 10‰) increases with decreasing amounts of elemental sulfur.  The d34Sw.s. (0 to 12‰) covers the range of all sulfur forms.  d34Sa.s. (3.5 to 10 ‰) is generally similar to d34Ssulfur.  The maximum difference of 7 ‰ between d34Sa.s. and  d34Ssulfur is in contrast to many volcanic settings where d34Ssulfur << d34Ssulfated34Spyrite (–2 to 3.2 ‰) does not vary systematically whether the associated minerals include smectite, alunite+kaolinite or gypsum+sulfur.  d34SSsulfur of the parent hydrothermal fluids generally increased through the sequence of alteration minerals.  d34S and d18O data support a hydrothermal origin for pyrite, sulfur, anhydrite, alunite and most jarosite. Weathering of pyrite in the debris flows formed some water-soluble sulfates and some jarosite.  The positive correlation of d18Ow.s. (-7 to 15 ‰) with d34Sw.s. is attributed to mixing of hydrothermal sulfate with sulfate from sulfide weathering.  The results can not be explained by a simple model of alteration.  Observations and isotope data are compatible with depletion of sulfur in underlying crystallizing magma, increasingly oxidized hydrothermal fluids, multiple episodes of alteration, and disequilibria among sulfur and mineral species.

 

 

2003 Seattle Annual Meeting (November 2–5, 2003)
Session No. 218
Hydrothermal Alteration on Active Volcanoes: Processes, Rates, and Applications to Hazards and Resources
Washington State Convention and Trade Center: 615/616/617
8:00 AM-12:00 PM, Wednesday, November 5, 2003

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 35, No. 6, September 2003, p. 553

© Copyright 2003 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.