2003 Seattle Annual Meeting (November 2–5, 2003)
Paper No. 152-48
Presentation Time: 8:00 AM-12:00 PM

EMPIRICAL GARNET THERMOBAROMETER FOR MANTLE PERIDOTITES

ASHCHEPKOV, Igor Victorovich, Russian Academy of Sciences Siberian Branch, United Institute of Geology Geophysics and Mineralogy, Academician V.A.Koptyg ave.3, Novosibirsk-90, Novosibirsk 630090 Russia, garnet@uiggm.nsc.ru.

Great efforts made by W.L.Griffin, S.Y.O’Reilly, C.G Rayan (1996-2003) for the mapping of the mantle lithosphere of Siberian and North American cratons with garnet thermobarometry reveal general structure of the mantle. Nevertheless correlation of the Ni-Cr thermobarometry with common and precise Ga-Al-orthopyroxene barometry and two pyroxene thermometry is not high. Empirical calibration on the large volume of the associations of the xenoliths allowed to obtain the equations which give high correlations with the estimates produced by (McGregor,1974) barometer (R=0.83) and with orthopyroxene (Brey,Kohler,1990) thermometer. Dependence of ln(Kd)/P from the estimated T BreyKohlreOpx is a polynomial (R=0.783) Kd=MgO*TiO2/(CaO+Mg)^2/ FeO^2/(Al2O3) ToC=1466.5*(ln Kd/P )^3+4108.9*(ln Kd/P )^2+3670.3* ln Kd/P +1800 {1} components are in oxide wt% for more simple calculations in thermobarometric program. Analogical equation for estimates with (Nimis Taylor, 2000) thermometer is ToC=362.05*(LnKd/P)^3+1880.4*( LnKd/P)^2+2659.6 *LnKd/P+1695.5 {2} (R=0.83). Kd=Na2O*TiO2/(CaO+MgO)^2/ FeO/(Al2O3) Checking kimberlite localities in the World (Jericho, Thumb, Udachnaya etc) show that approximations to orthopyroxene temperatures produced better coincidence with estimated by other methods geotherms but for HT associations clinopyroxen- aproximation temperatures give higher values for HT metasomatites, sheared peridotites. For the pressure the dependence for Cr2O3 from the pressure was used with the corrections on the temperatures. The simple equation is P=3.725 + 4.52*Cr2O3+ 0.01285*T {3} is works better for the shallow mantle to 40 kbar. To reproduce the deep structure beneath the Udachnaya (Ashchepkov et al., 2003) and other mantle columns the more complex equation P0=((13.5+Cr2O3*4.5/(CaO+MnO+0.25*FeO) 1.25+0.01685*ToC*Cr2O3)-19/MgO/7-CaO /5- 3.75*TiO2)*5 {4} the P=0.0064*P0^2+1.3816*P0 +5.1442{5} give the R=0.9 to McGregor’s estimates. Comparison for several pipes and World data show similarity with the estimates based on clinopyroxene (Nimis, Taylor, 2000, Ashchepkov, 2002) and orthopyroxene methods (Brey, Kohler, 1990-McGregor, 1974).

2003 Seattle Annual Meeting (November 2–5, 2003)
Session No. 152--Booth# 61
Petrology, Igneous (Posters)
Washington State Convention and Trade Center: Hall 4-F
8:00 AM-12:00 PM, Tuesday, November 4, 2003

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 35, No. 6, September 2003, p. 326

© Copyright 2003 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.