2003 Seattle Annual Meeting (November 2–5, 2003)
Paper No. 183-5
Presentation Time: 2:30 PM-2:45 PM

MECHANICAL MODEL FOR THE CASCADIA SUBDUCTION WEDGE, FOREARC BASINS AND MEGATHRUST EARTHQUAKES

WILLETT, Sean D.1, BRANDON, Mark2, and FULLER, Christopher1, (1) Department of Earth and Space Sciences, Univ of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, swillett@u.washington.edu, (2) Dept of Geology and Geophysics, Yale Univ, PO Box 208109, New Haven, CT 06520-8109

The Cascadia forearc exhibits a characteristic structural morphology in common with most active margins. From trench to arc, the margin consists of margin-parallel domains including the (1) the trench slope, with piggy-back style slope basins; (2) the continental shelf, an region of little deformation, and deposition of up to several km of sediment in shelf basins; (3) a coastal mountain belt with net rock uplift over geologic time; and (4) a topographic and sometimes depositional basin. In Cascadia, the latter two correspond to the Coast Range, Olympics, and Insular Ranges and the Willamette Valley, Puget Sound, and Georgia Strait, respectively, We present a model that suggests the entire forearc system can be explained in terms of critical wedge theory. Critical wedge theory predicts a critical surface slope from a decollement dip, decollement yield stress and wedge yield stress. To obtain the morphology of the Cascadia margin, it is necessary to consider the effects of flexural compensation, the transition from frictional to viscous deformation and sedimentation. The four domains of the forearc are explained as follows. (1) The trench slope is a critical wedge with a shallowly-dipping decollement. (2) The shelf overlies the more steeply-dipping slab, so that the critical surface slope dips landward. This results in a structural high at the shelf edge, trapping sediments in shelf basins. The sedimentation increases the surface slope from negative to zero, causing the wedge to be stable rather than critical and thus prevents this segment of the wedge from deforming. (3) In our model, the coast overlies the frictional-viscous transition for the decollement, such that an effective detachment forms along a sub-horizontal isotherm in the upper plate. The coast ranges correspond to this region with ongoing deformation a consequence of the critical state of the wedge. (4) This wedge is backthrust over the arc basement, flexing it down, forming the forearc lowlands and basins. Sedimentation in these basins helps localize deformation in the coastal high. Megathrust earthquakes are confined to the shelf (our domain 2); this mechanical model suggests that great earthquakes are associated with a stable, not internally-deforming upper plate and are linked with structures that form over geologic timescales.

2003 Seattle Annual Meeting (November 2–5, 2003)
Session No. 183
New Views of Seismic Hazard in Cascadia I: Seismology and Seismotectonics II
Washington State Convention and Trade Center: Ballroom 6C
1:30 PM-5:30 PM, Tuesday, November 4, 2003

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 35, No. 6, September 2003, p. 478

© Copyright 2003 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.