| 2003 Seattle Annual Meeting (November 2–5, 2003) | |
| Paper No. 248-13 | |
| Presentation Time: 4:45 PM-5:00 PM | ||
THE CURVATURE OF CARBONATE AND SILICICLASTIC CLINOFORMS | ||
|
ADAMS, Erwin W., Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, adams@erl.mit.edu. Curve fitting on the first-order morphology of seismic, submarine slope profiles resulted in the classification of three basic types of slope curvature: sigmoidal, exponential, and linear profiles. For carbonate platform flanks the distribution of these three types is dominated by exponential (55%) and linear (35%) profiles; sigmoidal profiles (10%) are a minority. Siliciclastic continental margins are mostly sigmoidal (55%) and exponential (35%); siliciclastic deltas are mostly exponential (60%) and contain not many sigmoidal profiles (5%). A possible explanation of the origin of the three types is that the boundary between the shelf and slope domain is narrow, the shelf edge sharp, and the curvature exponential if sedimentary base level remains stationary during progradation. Sigmoidal slope profiles develop where shelfbreaks are rounded off due to erosion and redistribution of sediment during storms and sea-level fluctuations. A straight slope segment develops where during progradation the slope steepens to the angle of repose. High rates of progradation, coupled with small fluctuations of base level, thus explain exponential and linear profiles. Several observations agree with the above explanation of the three basic types of slope curvature. For examples, glaciated continental margins where the shelfbreak is fixed by grounding ice-sheets and carbonate platform flanks where fast progradation is coupled with a vertically stationary margin both explain steep, exponential and linear slope profiles. On the other hand, half of the profiles from siliciclastic continental margins are sigmoidal. This is attributed to their generally modest rate of progradation and their long depositional history during which they were exposed to numerous fluctuations of base level. | ||
|
2003 Seattle Annual Meeting (November 2–5, 2003)
| ||
| Session No. 248 Clinoforms: Past, Present, and Modeled Washington State Convention and Trade Center: 602/603/604 1:30 PM-5:30 PM, Wednesday, November 5, 2003 Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 35, No. 6, September 2003, p. 626 | ||
© Copyright 2003 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions. | ||