2003 Seattle Annual Meeting (November 2–5, 2003)
Paper No. 39-7
Presentation Time: 2:30 PM-2:45 PM

SHORELINE TUFAS OF PLEISTOCENE LAKE BONNEVILLE, UTAH: WHAT CAN BE LEARNED FROM SUCH DEPOSITS?

NELSON, Stephen, WOOD, M. Jay, MAYO, Alan, and TINGEY, David, Dept. of Geology, Brigham Young Univ, S389 ESC, Provo, UT 84602, stn@geology.byu.edu

Tufas (swash-zone) and tufaglomerates (cemented subaqueous colluvium) on well-developed Stansbury (oldest, lowest), Bonneville (highest, intermediate age), and Provo (intermediate elevation, youngest) Lake Bonneville shorelines on the Silver Island Range present an opportunity to examine paleo-chemical gradients between the “open” Great Salt Lake and “restricted” Pilot Valley sub-basins of Lake Bonneville through time and space.

Stable isotope statistics show that outliers may either produce false correlations or mask true correlations. Neglecting outliers, mean d18OVSMOW values of all three shorelines are statistically indistinguishable (~27‰). However, deposits from the restricted arm were enriched (~0.3‰) in d18O, consistent with slightly elevated evaporation in the Pilot Valley sub-basin. d18O values in tufa were enriched over tufaglomerate by ~0.6‰, consistent with greater evaporative enrichment of lake water in the swash zone.

d13CPDB values show increasing means for the Provo, Stansbury, and Bonneville shorelines (4.4, 5.0, and 5.2‰, respectively), indicating that paleo-productivity was highest during Bonneville time. d13C values are also depleted by 0.3‰ in tufas relative to tufaglomerates, suggesting higher productivity below the swash zone, although no discernable difference occurs between sub-basins. 14C ages of Bonneville and Provo tufas give reliable results, but the apparent age of one Stansbury tufa is too young by thousands of years, although other ages reported for Stansbury tufa appear to be correct (Oviatt et al., 1992). As Stansbury tufa was submerged for ~8 ka following deposition, recrystallization or precipitation of younger cements may overprint primary isotope systematics.

Comparisons with marls of similar age (Oviatt et al., 1994) indicate that shoreline carbonate was much more enriched in d13C and d18O (both ~2.5‰) during Bonneville time, whereas isotopic differences were minor (both ~1‰) in Stansbury time. The lake episodically had an outlet during the Bonneville stage and was closed during the Stansbury stage, suggesting that inflow/outflow conditions or surface area/volume ratios exert an important influence on the isotopic composition of carbonate precipitated in the water column in the middle of a lake versus its shoreline.

2003 Seattle Annual Meeting (November 2–5, 2003)
Session No. 39
Limnogeology: Carbon in Lake Systems
Washington State Convention and Trade Center: 204
1:00 PM-3:45 PM, Sunday, November 2, 2003

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 35, No. 6, September 2003, p. 105

© Copyright 2003 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.