| 2003 Seattle Annual Meeting (November 2–5, 2003) | |
| Paper No. 58-7 | |
| Presentation Time: 9:30 AM-9:45 AM | ||
ARTIFICIAL HYDROLOGIC CONTROLS AND THE GEOMORPHOLOGY OF THE GREATER PHOENIX AREA | ||
|
MACLEOD, Amanda, Geological Sciences, Arizona State University, 2337 West Solano Drive, Phoenix, AZ 85015, amanda.macleod@asu.edu and ARROWSMITH, Ramon, Geological Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287 The way in which humans rearrange and utilize the landscape is a powerful geomorphic force. The greater Phoenix area is well suited to study the effects of artificial hydrology and geomorphology. As one of the fastest growing cities in the United States and inhabited by nearly three million people in a semi-arid region, water here is a highly valued and managed resource. We address two questions: 1) to what degree do artificial controls on hydrologic processes alter those flow systems, and 2) how do these changes affect urban geomorphology? There are a variety of reasons for which any city alternately draws to and diverts water away from a location – these are primarily to deliver water or divert floodwater. In Phoenix, engineered solutions to these cultural pressures include groundwater pumping and agricultural irrigation, the construction of residential and industrial buildings, flood prevention structures, mining operations, canals, dams, washes, and the sustaining of aesthetically lush areas. We have looked at a few specific areas in answering these questions. Cave Creek is an increasingly developed watershed, running from 40 km north of Phoenix into the historically oldest part of the city. The overland flow through this area becomes increasingly managed downstream, as it is constrained from its natural network into a single volume-restricted channel and a series of retention basins. It is then diverted into the adjacent Agua Fria River to reduce the watershed size and thus the geomorphic impact on urban areas downstream of the original channel. Another example is that of Indian Bend Wash, constructed in 1974. This flood control structure was once an ephemeral desert wash, but due to human geomorphology it is today a string of perennial lakes. The artificial control most evident here lies in the geometry of the flow channel and the prevention of natural erosion processes. Finally, the Hohokam Native Americans who lived on the Salt River (South Phoenix and Tempe) built a system of irrigation canals, but still experienced natural geomorphic processes like flood events. Today, in response to urban expansion, dams and other flood control structures throughout the watershed have essentially dried up the flow of the Salt River. It is diverted instead into a network of canals, delivering water far outside the natural floodplain. | ||
|
2003 Seattle Annual Meeting (November 2–5, 2003)
| ||
| Session No. 58 Hydrogeology I: Hydrology and Water Resources Washington State Convention and Trade Center: 613/614 8:00 AM-12:00 PM, Monday, November 3, 2003 Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 35, No. 6, September 2003, p. 157 | ||
© Copyright 2003 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions. | ||