| Rocky Mountain - 55th Annual Meeting (May 7-9, 2003) | |
| Paper No. 5-1 | |
| Presentation Time: 1:00 PM-1:15 PM | ||
ACID MINE PHILOSOPHY | ||
|
FRODEMAN, Robert, Center for Science and Technology Policy Research, Univ of Colorado, 1333 Grandview Ave, CB 488, Boulder, CO 80309-0488, frodeman@colorado.edu. There is a standard way to address environmental controversies—through the artful combination of science and public policy. Science provides the facts needed for decision-making, and the law represents the will of the people: what Kai Lee has called “compass and gyroscope.” But to adequately address our environmental problems we need more than good science and democratic policy. We also need philosophy. For many, the word “philosophy” summons up an image of Socrates in a toga, distracting people from their daily tasks by asking a series of pointless questions. But philosophy worthy of its name (“the love of wisdom”) begins on the ground, scrambling over scree, poking around in just such unsightly holes as abandoned mines in the San Juans. In its best dress, philosophy wears hiking boots and carries a walking stick, wandering nature trails that lead into the heart of our cultural wildernesses. This talk will use the acid mine drainage controversy in the San Juan Mountains as a case study in the use of philosophy to help address environmental controversies. In the San Juans, questions concerning acid mine drainage center upon the upper Animas drainage. The San Juans contain large amounts of base metals locked up with sulfur as sulfide compounds. Exposing the metal-bearing rock to air and water mobilizes these metals, releasing them as well as sulfuric acid into the streams. The pH of the upper Animas is in many cases low enough to cause aquatic life to be deformed or die. Philosophy can play at least two critical roles in environmental controversies like acid mine drainage. First, it can provide an account of the specifically philosophic aspects of our environmental problems, the ethical, aesthetic, epistemological, metaphysical, and theological dimensions which we must acknowledge before we can solve. These dimensions are more central to our concerns with the environment than we acknowledge: often the law and scientific data are stalking horses that disguise the fundamentally philosophic nature of our concerns. Second, philosophy can provide a synopsis of how the various specialized disciplines relate within a given problem. Questions such as acid mine drainage refuse to follow strict disciplinary boundaries. Rather, they require a logic that is willing to track an argument across all the domains of knowledge. | ||
|
Rocky Mountain - 55th Annual Meeting (May 7-9, 2003)
General Information for this Meeting | ||
| Session No. 5 The San Juan Mountains: A Dynamic Earth System II Fort Lewis College: Noble Hall 130 1:00 PM-2:35 PM, Wednesday, May 7, 2003 Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 35, No. 5, April 2003, p. 8 | ||
© Copyright 2003 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions. | ||