| Paper No. 8-7 | ||
| Presentation Time: 3:20 PM-3:40 PM | ||
| CLAW-MARKED BURROWS IN THE MIOCENE OF COLORADO: INDICATIONS OF MYLAGAULID (MAMMALIA:RODENTIA) PALEOECOLOGY | ||
|
GOBETZ, Katrina E. and MARTIN, Larry D., Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Univ of Kansas, Natural History Museum and Biodiversity Research Center, Dyche Hall, Lawrence, KS 66045, kgobetz@ku.edu The Pawnee Creek Formation of northeastern Colorado contains massive, sandy silt beds in which numerous vertebrate burrows occur. The fine sediments, localized channel deposits, and a high density of root casts (rhizoconcretions) suggest a flood plain environment with abundant trees and other vegetation. The burrows, unofficially named “Maeandrichnia,” are tubular, sinuous natural casts that preserve the inner wall surfaces of the original tunnels. They show prominent digging marks representing narrow, laterally compressed claws, and contain other clues to the paleobiology and ecology of the excavator and inhabitant(s). The most likely excavator of Maeandrichnia is Pterogaulus laevis, a mylagaulid rodent which is abundant in the burrow layers and other localities in the area. The long, recurved foreclaws of this rodent match the marks occurring on the tunnel walls. In addition, the complex branching patterns in Maeandrichnia tunnels suggest a mammalian, rather than a reptilian (tortoise) excavator. Cross-sectioned burrows show a relatively resistant outer fill layer of ca. 4 cm thickness, containing root casts and similar in aspect to the sediments in which the burrows occur. This layer forms a concentric wall around the tunnel, and shows no meniscate fill structures, indicating that it filled the entire tunnel at one time. A second, inner tunnel fill consists of unconsolidated sediment with abundant hackberry (Celtis sp.) seed husks and spheres of ca. 1 cm diameter, which may be anhydrite mineral crystals. This inner fill is easily removed, revealing a cavity of ca. 5.5 cm diameter. Molds of the boundary between this cavity and the outer fill layer may show trace marks, and help determine whether the cavity represents a secondary tunnel, excavated within the first after the original tunnel filled with sediment. Phytolith assemblages from outer vs. inner fill layers, as well as from end-chambers, distinguish concentrations of plants inside tunnels as possible nests or food caches. | ||
|
South-Central Section (37th) and Southeastern Section (52nd), GSA Joint Annual Meeting (March 12–14, 2003)
General Information for this Meeting | ||
| Session No. 8 Paleontology University of Memphis Conference Center: Fogelman Executive Center 219 1:00 PM-5:30 PM, Thursday, March 13, 2003 | ||
© Copyright 2003 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions. | ||