2004 Denver Annual Meeting (November 7–10, 2004)
Paper No. 162-4
Presentation Time: 2:15 PM-2:30 PM

TAPHONOMIC ALTERATION DIFFERENCES BETWEEN BIVALVES AND BARNACLES FROM TWO TAPHOFACIES

DALEY, Gwen M., Department of Chemistry, Physics and Geology, Winthrop Univ, Rock Hill, SC 29732, daleyg@winthrop.edu, SCHULTZ, Holly, Univ of Iowa, 121 Trowbridge Hall, Iowa City, IA 52242, MATTHEWS, Bradley W., South Carolina Governor's School for Sci and Math, 306 E. Home Avenue, Hartsville, SC 29550, and GEARY, Dana, Dept. of Geology & Geophysics, Univ of Wisconsin-Madison, 1215 W. Dayton St, Madison, WI 53706

The amount and type of taphonomic alteration of fossil deposits has proven useful in analyzing and reconstructing paleoenvironment. However, taphonomic analyses frequently examine the remains of only one type of organisms (e.g., bivalves, brachiopods, or foraminifera). In this study we examine the amount of taphonomic alteration in both bivalve and barnacle remains collected from two different Florida Pleistocene, shallow subtidal paleoenvironmental settings (Facies E from the Bermont Formation and Facies I from the Fort Thompson Formation).

An examination of fragmentation and abrasion of the shells of the venerid Chione cancellata revealed a greater degree of post-mortem alteration in samples from Facies I. Samples from both facies contained well preserved C. cancellata, but very poorly preserved C. cancellata were only abundant in samples from Facies I. We interpreted the relative abundance of severely worn C. cancellata in Facies I to indicate that the remains either had longer residence time in the taphonomically active zone, or that the local paleoenivironmental conditions were more energetic in Facies I.

The amount of post-mortem alteration of barnacle remains was determined by examining both the amount of disarticulation and the mass of the preserved fragments. Well-preserved, complete barnacle fossils were common in samples from Facies I, which was the facies in which taphonomic alteration of C. cancellata shells was greater. Complete barnacles were uncommon in Facies E, where taphonomic alteration of C. cancellata shells was low. In contrast, the average mass of barnacle fragments found in samples from Facies E was higher than those found in Facies I, perhaps indicating the same pattern of taphonomic alteration found in the analysis of C. cancellata.

These results that indicated a more complex interpretation of paleoenvironmental conditions and taphonomic alteration was required than that yielded by either analysis alone. We will examine several possible interpretations of these results.

2004 Denver Annual Meeting (November 7–10, 2004)
General Information for this Meeting
Session No. 162
Paleontology VIII: Processes of Fossilization
Colorado Convention Center: 108/110/112
1:30 PM-5:30 PM, Tuesday, November 9, 2004

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 36, No. 5, p. 382

© Copyright 2004 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.