| 2004 Denver Annual Meeting (November 7–10, 2004) | |
| Paper No. 211-1 | |
| Presentation Time: 8:05 AM-8:20 AM | ||
DOES ELECTRONIC STUDENT RESPONSE TECHNOLOGY WORK IN A SMALL LIBERAL ARTS CLASSROOM? | ||
|
GREER, Lisa, Geology Department, Washington and Lee Univ, Washington and Lee University, Lexington, VA 24450, greerl@wlu.edu and HEANEY, Peter J., Dept. of Geosciences, Pennsylvania State Univ, 309 Deike Bldg, University Park, PA 16802 Electric student response technology can be an effective teaching and learning tool in large introductory geoscience classes. It is less clear to what degree small classes benefit from the use of this technology. As a first order measure of "effectiveness," students from two very different academic settings were surveyed to determine the student-perceived utility of this technology in their classroom. The Classroom Performance System (CPS) was utilized as a pedagogical tool in Geosc 20: Planet Earth at Penn State University in 2002-2004 (up to 210 students per section) and Geo 102: Historical Geology at Washington and Lee University in Winter 2004 (22 students). Both are introductory geoscience general education courses designed for non-majors. While Penn State is a large research-1 state university, Washington and Lee is a small private liberal arts institution with an enrollment of ~2100 students. Preliminary indications are that Geo 102 students at Washington and Lee consider CPS to be a highly useful classroom tool for synthesis of material presented in the course despite initially seeming less engaged and invested in the process than students at Penn State. A significantly higher percentage of Washington and Lee respondents (in comparison with Penn State students) more strongly agreed with the following statements: The CPS helps me to gauge my level of understanding of course material; The CPS reinforces important concepts presented in lecture; The CPS improves my problem solving skills; and The CPS is an effective teaching and learning tool. A greater percentage of Washington and Lee respondents also found the system fun to use. CPS use was less effective in increasing the desire of Washington and Lee students to come to class. The overall level of satisfaction with CPS was higher at Washington and Lee than at Penn State. Perhaps most surprising, despite the small class size at Washington and Lee (which is believed to facilitate more classroom interaction), a higher percentage of Washington and Lee students agreed that the CPS system increased their willingness to ask questions in class. In fact, 100% of Washington and Lee respondents recommend the use of CPS technology in Geology 102 and other classes at Washington and Lee. | ||
|
2004 Denver Annual Meeting (November 7–10, 2004)
General Information for this Meeting | ||
| Session No. 211 Electronic Student Response Technology in the Geoscience Classroom: Is it a Valuable Teaching and Learning Tool? Colorado Convention Center: 601 8:00 AM-12:00 PM, Wednesday, November 10, 2004 Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 36, No. 5, p. 489 | ||
© Copyright 2004 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions. | ||