| 2004 Denver Annual Meeting (November 7–10, 2004) | |
| Paper No. 190-1 | |
| Presentation Time: 1:30 PM-5:30 PM | ||
OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES FOR STRONG GEOSCIENCE DEPARTMENTS: RESULTS OF A NATIONAL SURVEY | ||
|
RICHARDSON, Randall M., Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Gould Simpson 208, Tucson, AZ 85721-0077, rmr@email.arizona.edu and BECK, Susan L., Department of Geosciences, Univ of Arizona, Gould Simpson 208, Tucson, AZ 85721-0077 During the 2003-2004 academic year, we surveyed 63 geoscience departments, drawn primarily from the research-intensive institutions in the American Association of Universities, on the challenges, threats and opportunities they felt they faced in the next 3-5 years, and the role that planning played, or could play, in addressing departmental needs. The survey was completed at over an 80% rate, and while confirming that not all geoscience departments are identical in their needs and issues, found a large number of issues common among many departments, even considering the very wide range of departments involved (over at least an order of magnitude in size and resources). For example: • Many departments see opportunities in large, community-wide initiatives such as EarthScope, and in interdisciplinary science, in the next 3-5 years. • Most departments felt that the biggest threat in the next 3-5 years was declining resources, and the associated problems (faculty retention, lab support, etc.). • For departments facing faculty retention issues, many recognized the benefit of pre-emptive measures. Responding to outside offers, many found benefit in strong, prompt counter offers, and the growing need to address spousal/partner job issues. • In terms of recruiting faculty, the strategy most commonly cited was substantial start-up packages. • For both graduate and undergraduate students, recruitment was much more of an issue than retention. Recruitment strategies were quite variable, but involved lots of personal contact. • The vast majority of departments felt it was important to integrate, or balance, research and education. The most commonly cited example was undergraduate research opportunities. • Planning was seen as overwhelmingly valuable, but written comments carried an undertone of frustration with planning in a rapidly varying environment. Planning was found most useful for faculty hiring plans and for curriculum reform/revision. | ||
|
2004 Denver Annual Meeting (November 7–10, 2004)
General Information for this Meeting | ||
| Session No. 190--Booth# 119 Building Strong Geoscience Departments: Opportunities, Successes, and Challenges (Posters) Colorado Convention Center: Exhibit Hall 1:30 PM-5:30 PM, Tuesday, November 9, 2004 Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 36, No. 5, p. 443 | ||
© Copyright 2004 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions. | ||