| 2004 Denver Annual Meeting (November 7–10, 2004) | |
| Paper No. 123-13 | |
| Presentation Time: 1:30 PM-5:30 PM | ||
CREATING A SINKHOLE GIS DATABASE: CAN ALSM DETECT SINKHOLES IN URBANIZED FLORIDA? | ||
|
SEALE, L. Don1, BRINKMANN, Robert2, and VACHER, H.L.1, (1) Department of Geology, University of South Florida, 4202 E. Fowler Ave, SCA 528, Tampa, FL 33620, lseale2@mail.usf.edu, (2) Department of Geography and Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of South Florida, 4202 E. Fowler Ave, CPR 107, Tampa, FL 33620 We applied airborne laser swath mapping (ALSM, aka LIDAR, for light detection and ranging)) to delineate depressions in Pinellas County, Florida, for the purpose of assessing whether it is possible to map remnant sinkholes in urbanized Florida karst. ALSM data, which covered all of Pinellas County (1,574 sq. km), had been collected by Geosensing Engineering and Mapping (GEM) Research Center, Gainesville, FL for the Pinellas County Government in 2000. After filtering the data to remove vegetation and buildings, we were left with more than 100 million measurements of bare-earth x,y,z coordinates. We divided these point data into manageable sizes, imported them into ESRI ArcGIS 8, and constructed a grid with 2.133-m (7-ft) spacing using the inverse-distance weighting (IDW) technique. The IDW technique easily captures subtle discrete changes in a uniform background. We found that IDW was the best technique to use in Pinellas County, due to the flat topography punctuated by sinkhole development. Contouring the grid with a 0.304-m (1-ft) contour interval produced numerous closed-contour depressions (CCDs). These apparent sinkholes, stood out in sharp contrast to the surrounding flat terrain. In order to assess accuracy, we compared the contour map with color aerial photos within a GIS. If we confirmed that a CCD was most likely a sinkhole, we converted it to a shape file and added it to a Pinellas County sinkhole GIS database. Urban development was a definite impediment to identifying remnant sinkholes. Buildings that were filtered out created large voids in the point data. Many swimming pools appeared as CCDs. Highly reflective surfaces produced multi-path laser returns. Anthropogenic modifications to the land surface disrupted the uniformity of the background signal. We conclude that, although ALSM is a valuable tool for locating sinkholes, in general, it is certainly best utilized in undeveloped areas. | ||
|
2004 Denver Annual Meeting (November 7–10, 2004)
General Information for this Meeting | ||
| Session No. 123--Booth# 119 GIS, GPS, and Remote Sensing in Geologic Hazard Assessment (Posters) Colorado Convention Center: Exhibit Hall 1:30 PM-5:30 PM, Monday, November 8, 2004 Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 36, No. 5, p. 299 | ||
© Copyright 2004 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions. | ||