| 2004 Denver Annual Meeting (November 7–10, 2004) | |
| Paper No. 102-7 | |
| Presentation Time: 3:45 PM-4:00 PM | ||
MODELING SUBGLACIAL GROUNDWATER ALONG A FLOW LINE OF THE SCANDINAVIAN ICE SHEET USING MODFLOW | ||
|
MOELLER, Carolyn, Department of Geology and Geophysics, Univeristy of Wisconsin-Madison, 1215 W. Dayton Street, Weeks Hall, Madison, WI 53706, moeller@geology.wisc.edu, MICKELSON, David M., Geology and Geophysics, Univ of Wisconsin-Madison, 1215 W. Dayton St, Madison, WI 53706, ANDERSON, Mary P., Univ Wisconsin - Madison, 1215 W Dayton St, Madison, WI 53706-1692, and WINGUTH, Cornelia, Geology and Geophysics, Univ. of Wisconsin - Madison, 1215 W. Dayton St, Madison, WI 53706 Basal water pressure and flow patterns are significant factors in controlling the behavior of an ice sheet, because they influence ice sheet thickness, stability, and extent. Water, if produced by basal melting, travels toward the ice margin through the groundwater system, and if present in sufficient quantities, as sheet or channelized flow. The flow of subglacial groundwater along a flow line of the Scandinavian Ice Sheet is examined using a two-dimensional MODFLOW-based profile model, assuming that groundwater flow is parallel to the ice flow line. The amount of basal meltwater being added to the system is derived from a two-dimensional, time dependent, thermomechanically coupled ice flow model along the same flow line. The meltwater component from the ice-flow model is used as recharge input for the groundwater model, and evolving ice-sheet topography is used to compare resulting porewater pressures to the ice overburden pressures. The groundwater model allows us to test the flow capacity of the aquifer along this flow line, the importance of a drainage system, and the effects of changing ice margin positions on subglacial hydrology. Results show that the sediment layer underlying the ice would not have been capable of transmitting all of the meltwater out of the fjord during times of advance, as well as at the maximum position at the edge of the continental shelf. The model simulations for glacial retreat indicate that the sediments could have easily handled all of the basal meltwater, but once an addition of surface melt is included in the simulation, groundwater flow through the sediment layer is no longer a sufficient means of meltwater evacuation. This suggests that other forms of basal drainage must have been present during these stages of glaciation. Episodes of high basal water pressure may explain non-climatically driven margin readvances during the overall retreat phase. | ||
|
2004 Denver Annual Meeting (November 7–10, 2004)
General Information for this Meeting | ||
| Session No. 102 Quaternary Geology II Colorado Convention Center: 705/707 1:30 PM-5:30 PM, Monday, November 8, 2004 Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 36, No. 5, p. 249 | ||
© Copyright 2004 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions. | ||