| 2004 Denver Annual Meeting (November 7–10, 2004) | |
| Paper No. 208-6 | |
| Presentation Time: 9:15 AM-9:30 AM | ||
EVIDENCE FOR A LARGE TO VERY LARGE EARTHQUAKE AT ~AD 1100 ON THE HIMALAYAN MAIN FRONTAL THRUST, NEPAL | ||
|
YULE, Doug1, LAVE, Jerome2, SAPKOTA, Som3, BASANT, Kafle3, MADDEN, Chris4, ATTAL, Mikael2, and PANDEY, R.3, (1) Department of Geological Sciences, California State Univ, Northridge, CA 91330-8266, j.d.yule@csun.edu, (2) Laboratoire de Geodynamique des Chaines Alpines, Grenoble, (3) Seismolab, Department of Mines and Geology, Kathmandu, Nepal, (4) Earth Consultants Int'l, Tustin, CA 92780 The Himalayan orogen has produced four Mw>7.8 thrust earthquakes during the past century. Despite their great magnitude, no surface ruptures associated with these events have been documented. We present evidence from outcrop and trench exposures in the Mahra Khola region of east-central Nepal that a large to very large earthquake ruptured the Main Frontal Thrust fault (MFT) at ~A.D. 1100, with a displacement of ~17 +6/-3 m close to the surface. In contrast, no evidence exists for surface rupture in this region during the 1934 Bihar Nepal Mw8.4 earthquake. Warping of Holocene terraces to the west of the study area indicates that most of the shortening across the Himalayas is expressed in a frontal fold and that this folding probably results from strain transfer by large earthquakes. Based on paleoseismologic results in southeast Nepal (Nakata et.al., 1998), we hypothesize that the lateral extent of the ~A.D. 1100 event could have exceeded 300 km, and that its size could have reached ~Mw9.0, similar to megathrust earthquakes in subduction zones. In this scenario, the uppermost 2 km of the MFT represents a zone of velocity strengthening through which only very large earthquakes can break. Ruptures associated with Mw<8.5 events would therefore die out upward, with strain closer to the surface transferring to the frontal Himalayan fold. Although less probable, we can not discard an opposite end-member hypothesis, a Chi-Chi type earthquake, for which high local values (>10 m) of surface displacement are associated with Mw<8 earthquakes that have lateral extents of <100 km and activate only the shallow, frontal part of the decollement. Both hypotheses imply significant modifications to current seismotectonic models based on the historical seismicity and have major implications for estimating seismic hazard, modeling seismic rupture, and conducting paleoseismologic trench studies of large thrust systems. | ||
|
2004 Denver Annual Meeting (November 7–10, 2004)
General Information for this Meeting | ||
| Session No. 208 Recent Advances in Himalayan Geology Colorado Convention Center: 708/710/712 8:00 AM-12:00 PM, Wednesday, November 10, 2004 Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 36, No. 5, p. 483 | ||
© Copyright 2004 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions. | ||