| 2004 Denver Annual Meeting (November 7–10, 2004) | |
| Paper No. 70-8 | |
| Presentation Time: 10:00 AM-10:15 AM | ||
NUCLEAR FACILITIES IN THE OAK RIDGE RESERVATION: INFLUENCES OF BEDROCK GEOLOGY AND STRUCTURE ON SITING AND 50+ YEARS OF PERFORMANCE | ||
|
HATCHER, Robert D., Earth & Planetary Sciences, Univ of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, bobmap@utk.edu and STOW, Stephen H., American Museum of Sci and Energy, 300 S Tulane Ave, Oak Ridge, TN 37830 The Oak Ridge Reservation (ORR), located in the Appalachian Valley and Ridge (V & R) is most geologically complex of the Department of the Energy (DOE) sites. Three nuclear facilities were built during World War II, two (K–25 and Y–12) for isotope separation and weapons production, and a third (X–10, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, ORNL) primarily for research. Each was located in a separate valley for safety reasons. V & R topography played a role in siting facilities. Geology consists of SE-dipping Cambrian and Ordovician clastic and carbonate rocks repeated by several major NW-vergent thrusts. Sandstone and cherty carbonate rocks form ridges, and shale and limestone underlie valleys. The first waste disposal was in Ordovician limestone at ORNL. It was also recognized that shale would absorb and immobilize many dissolved radionuclides, so additional low-level waste disposal was in the Cambrian Consasauga Shale. Highly contaminated liquid nuclear waste has been disposed of in Conasauga Shale by several methods, including seepage pits and trenches (1950’s) and deep-well injection (1960’s-1980’s). Organic compound, heavy metal, and radionuclide contamination exists in parts of the ORR. Some contaminants migrated off site into the Tennessee River, and have been detected at Chattanooga, TN. Ground water systems do not form classic aquifers, inhibiting use of computer-based transport models, but hydrostratigraphic units have been defined that correspond to major clastic and carbonate units. The Knox Group was designated an aquifer because of its widespread karst development and subsurface dissolution enhancement of fracture aperture. Attempts to employ the diverse contaminants, whose sources and times of introduction into the environment are often known, for research directed toward increased ability to model ground water pathways and movement rates in this complex geologic setting have mostly not occurred. Perhaps justifiably, greater funding priority has emphasized contaminated area remediation. The new Spallation Neutron Source was located on a ridge top underlain by pinnacled Knox Group karst creating problems in foundation excavation and stabilization. Overall, the original location and disposal concept have performed reasonably throughout the history of the ORR, and the large contamination problems are gradually being remediated. | ||
|
2004 Denver Annual Meeting (November 7–10, 2004)
General Information for this Meeting | ||
| Session No. 70 Structural Geology I: Cordilleran Structures to Hydraulic Fracturing Colorado Convention Center: 104/106 8:00 AM-12:00 PM, Monday, November 8, 2004 Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 36, No. 5, p. 180 | ||
© Copyright 2004 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions. | ||