| 2004 Denver Annual Meeting (November 7–10, 2004) | |
| Paper No. 10-7 | |
| Presentation Time: 9:55 AM-10:10 AM | ||
EVOLUTION OF CONDUITS IN CARBONATE AQUIFERS AFTER BREAKTHROUGH | ||
|
WORTHINGTON, Stephen R.H., Worthington Groundwater, 55 Mayfair Ave, Dundas, ON L9H 3K9, sw@worthingtongroundwater.com. Numerical modeling has become a widely-used tool to investigate the early stages of karstification. Modeling typically shows that the process of fracture enlargement from apertures of less than 0.1 mm up to the onset of turbulent flow takes some 104 years. This point is known as breakthrough and occurs when fracture aperture is about 1 cm. Almost all numerical models have been terminated at this point, and the course of conduit evolution after breakthrough has not been studied in detail. A series of numerical simulations were performed for a single pipe-full conduit, commencing at breakthrough. Both numerical modeling and field measurements have shown that conduit enlargement (i.e. wall retreat) rates may be as great as 1 mm/year, and a range 0.01 - 1 mm/year was used in the modeling. Simulations also varied Darcy-Weisbach friction factors (0.03 - 3), the catchment areas for the conduit (0.1 - 1000 km2) and the mode of groundwater recharge (allogenic or autogenic). Simulations demonstrate three distinct phases for conduit development after breakthrough. During the initial phase there are rapid increases in conduit diameter, discharge, velocity, and Reynolds number. This phase ends in the allogenic case when all surface stream flow is captured by the conduit. The second phase is characterized by constant discharge, a continued increase in conduit diameter, but a steady decrease in velocity, Reynolds number, and hydraulic gradient. The second phase ends where mean conduit velocity diminishes to about 0.02 m/s and sediment transport competence is lost, resulting in the commencement of sedimentation in the conduit. An equilibrium is established in the third phase between conduit diameter and velocity, with excess sediments being intermittently removed to the spring by high-discharge events. In the autogenic case, the decrease in hydraulic gradient in phase 2 promotes convergent groundwater flow to the low-head conduit and results in the formation of a conduit network. This model accounts for the widespread occurrence of clastic sediments in karst conduits as well as the observed distribution of measured tracer velocities, where many karst conduits have maximum observed velocities of about 0.1 m/s. | ||
|
2004 Denver Annual Meeting (November 7–10, 2004)
General Information for this Meeting | ||
| Session No. 10 Characterization and Representation of Flow through Karst Aquifers I Colorado Convention Center: 205 8:00 AM-12:00 PM, Sunday, November 7, 2004 Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 36, No. 5, p. 31 | ||
© Copyright 2004 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions. | ||