| 2004 Denver Annual Meeting (November 7–10, 2004) | |
| Paper No. 136-6 | |
| Presentation Time: 9:25 AM-9:40 AM | ||
CARBON ISOTOPES AS TRACERS OF GROUNDWATER AND SOIL WATER CONTRIBUTIONS TO STREAMFLOW IN A FORESTED HEADWATER CATCHMENT | ||
|
DOCTOR, Daniel H., U. S. Geol Survey, 345 Middlefield Rd, MS 434, Menlo Park, CA 94025, dhdoctor@usgs.gov, KENDALL, Carol, U.S. Geological Survey, MS 434, 345 Middlefield Rd, Menlo Park, CA 95025, SEBESTYEN, Stephen D., College of Environmental Science & Forestry, State Univ of New York, 211 Marshall Hall, 1 Forestry Drive, Syracuse, NY 13210-2788, and SHANLEY, James B., U.S. Geol Survey, Montpelier, VT 05601 Estimating soil water contributions to streamflow is of primary concern to hydrologists wishing to improve rainfall-runoff models, and quantification of carbon export from watersheds is of importance for understanding of global carbon fluxes. To aid in these efforts, we are measuring dissolved inorganic and organic carbon (DIC and DOC) concentrations and their bulk d13C values as tracers of soil water contributions to streams during runoff events. We present high-resolution time series measurements of DIC and DOC and their d13C values from samples of stream water, groundwater, and soil water collected at Sleepers River Research Watershed in Vermont, USA. DOC concentrations in groundwater are low (<2 ppm C), while soil water concentrations are higher (up to 8 ppm C). Groundwater DOC show distinct d13C values that are up to 6‰ more positive than those of soil water DOC. Stream DOC concentrations consistently peak at the highest stream flows, with d13C values 2-3‰ lower than those during low flow, indicating a change in primary source from groundwater to soil water during runoff events. DIC concentrations in groundwater are high (>10 ppm C) due to weathering of carbonate minerals in the watershed. In contrast, soils are carbonate-depleted and DIC concentrations in soil water are more than twice as low as those of groundwater (<5 ppm C). d13C of DIC values in groundwater show variable contributions from soil CO2 and dissolution of carbonate minerals, while soil water d13C of DIC values reflect soil CO2 alone. DIC concentrations in the stream drop during peak flow, as does d13C of DIC, again indicating greater soil water contributions to the stream at peak flow. However, d13C of DIC is affected by other processes occurring in the stream in addition to mixing between different source waters. For example, rapid outgassing of CO2 at the stream headwaters may cause the d13C of DIC to become higher than that predicted by a conservative mixing model, particularly during the growing season when soil PCO2 is highest. We present theoretical model calculations illustrating how CO2 outgassing may influence the d13C of stream water DIC. Field data will be discussed in the context of the model predictions as well as other possible interpretations of our observations with regard to the hydrological processes occurring in this watershed. | ||
|
2004 Denver Annual Meeting (November 7–10, 2004)
General Information for this Meeting | ||
| Session No. 136 Innovative Tracer Applications in Hydrogeology: New Techniques, Design and Interpretation Methods, and Case Studies I Colorado Convention Center: 205 8:00 AM-12:00 PM, Tuesday, November 9, 2004 Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 36, No. 5, p. 327 | ||
© Copyright 2004 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions. | ||