| North-Central Section - 38th Annual Meeting (April 1–2, 2004) | |
| Paper No. 4-4 | |
| Presentation Time: 9:00 AM-9:20 AM | ||
STAGE VARIABILITY OF THE MISSOURI RIVER AS RECORDED BY LEWIS AND CLARK | ||
|
EHLMANN, Bethany L., Earth and Planetary Sciences, Washington Univ, 1 Brookings Drive, Campus Box 1169, St. Louis, MO 63130, bethany.ehlmann@wustl.edu and CRISS, Robert E., Earth and Planetary Science, Washington Univ, One Brookings Dr, Saint Louis, MO 63130-4899 The journals of Meriwether Lewis and William Clark during the 1803-1806 Corps of Discovery contain detailed records of meteorological conditions and Missouri River stage levels for the winter camps at Camp DuBois (1803-4) at the mouth of the Missouri, and at Fort Mandan (1804-5), now in North Dakota near river mile 1372. Their measurements provide unique insight on the Missouri River prior to the profound modification of its channel by the Army Corps of Engineers starting in 1832, the regulation of its flow by six huge main-stem reservoirs constructed between 1937 and 1963, and the profound changes to its watershed following European settlement. Lewis and Clark’s data can be used to define daily changes in stage that can be compared with modern stage variability at gauging stations at St. Charles (mile 28) and St. Louis, MO (below confluence) and at Washburn ND (mile 1355). The modern Missouri River near St. Louis shows greater average daily stage change and greater standard deviations (St. Charles: 8.5 ± 14.4 inches; St. Louis: 9.1 ± 11.1) than did the river mouth at Camp DuBois in winter 1803-4 (5.0 ± 5.2 inches). The opposite trend is exhibited at Washburn where modern daily stage variability (1.0 ± 1.3 inches) is quite small compared to that observed at Fort Mandan in 1804-5 (4.1±7.1 inches). In the first case, the ~2x greater modern stage variability is due to profound constriction of the channel width by wing dikes and levees. For example, Lewis and Clark measured the river width near St. Charles as 720 yards in May 1804, where it is only 500 yards today. This channel constriction is widely recognized to be related to increases in flood stages of 4 to 9 ft. on the lower Missouri (Criss & Shock, Geology 2001). In contrast, the decreased modern variability seen in North Dakota is clearly due to regulation by huge, proximal, main stem reservoirs. Clearly, flow regulation by these main stem reservoirs and numerous others on tributaries does not fully offset the large increases in flood stages and greater stage variability caused by channel restriction and development in the lower basin. | ||
|
North-Central Section - 38th Annual Meeting (April 1–2, 2004)
| ||
| Session No. 4 Geochemistry and Dynamics of Large River Systems Millennium Hotel St. Louis: Choteau Room 8:00 AM-12:00 PM, Thursday, 1 April 2004 Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 36, No. 3, p. 7 | ||
© Copyright 2004 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions. | ||