| North-Central Section - 38th Annual Meeting (April 1–2, 2004) | |
| Paper No. 7-8 | |
| Presentation Time: 3:40 PM-4:00 PM | ||
SEGMENTATION OF RIVERS IN KANSAS BASED ON ACTIVITY LEVELS OF CONTRASTING REACHES | ||
|
DORT, Wakefield Jr, Geology, Univ of Kansas, 1475 Jayhawk Blvd, Lawrence, KS 66045, yolanda@ku.edu Plains rivers, in general, appear placid and seemingly uninteresting. Detailed research, however, reveals a different situation. The Kansas River, flowing on an average gradient of 1.9 feet/mile for 170 miles eastward from Junction City to its confluence with Missouri River at Kansas City, was examined for the Corps of Engineers. The study is being continued for the Kansas Geological Survey. Bank erosion and consequent migration of the channel is not now proceeding at the same rate along the entire river, nor has it in the past 150 years, the limit of accurate mapping of channel location and configuration. Some reaches have been in motion throughout the period , others for only the earlier or, conversely, later portion; yet other sections have not moved at all. On the basis of this record it is possible to subdivide the river into 11 activity-level segments. Because the valley floor is underlain by 50-100 feet of alluvial fill, it appears that channel activity is not controlled by subjacent bedrock. Data about subtle variations in channel gradient are not available. The Lower Neosho River, which follows a 177-mile course southward to Oklahoma on a gradient of 1.4 feet/mile, also displays reaches having contrasting intensities of channel activity; 15 can be delineated. In this instance, the stream bed lies on or only a few feet above bedrock, but the floodplain scrolls indicative of recent channel migration are insulated form the bedrock by 25-35 feet of alluvial fill. | ||
|
North-Central Section - 38th Annual Meeting (April 1–2, 2004)
| ||
| Session No. 7 Quaternary Geology and Geomorphology Millennium Hotel St. Louis: Meramec Ballroom 1:00 PM-5:00 PM, Thursday, 1 April 2004 Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 36, No. 3, p. 17 | ||
© Copyright 2004 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions. | ||