Northeastern Section (39th Annual) and Southeastern Section (53rd Annual) Joint Meeting (March 25–27, 2004)
Paper No. 68-3
Presentation Time: 8:00 AM-12:00 PM

NEAR-SURFACE GEOLOGY AND SUBSIDENCE IMAGING USING COINCIDENT 3D SURFACE-PENETRATING RADAR, MULTI-COMPONENT SEISMIC REFLECTION, AND CROSS-HOLE RADAR TOMOGRAPHY

CONROY, James P., ENSCO, Inc, 5400 Port Royal Rd, Springfield, VA 22151, conroy.james@ensco.com and GUY, Erich D., U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 502 Eighth Street, Huntington WV, WV 25701

Multi-component seismic reflection, surface-penetrating radar and cross-hole radar data were acquired in an area where a highway had collapsed due to mine subsidence. These data were acquired to test the applicability of each method for near-surface geology and subsidence problems, and to identify locations in the study area having a high risk for future failure. Using P-wave data we imaged the top of the saturated overburden, and using S-wave data we located vertical offsets and horizontal disruptions in the bedrock that resulted from subsidence processes. However, seismic data did not provide useful information about the road fill or roadway. This was due to surface wave interference, a lack of data resolution and insufficient media impedance contrasts. Although the penetration depth of surface radar was limited by road fill signal attenuation, 3D volumes of these data enabled high resolution imaging of rebar disruptions, fracture zones, and slump features within the roadway. The spacing of available boreholes and surface refracted-wave interference limited the effectiveness of the cross-hole radar in the near-surface road fill. However, using velocity tomograms and amplitude information, zones of increased secondary porosity were mapped in the overburden and bedrock that resulted from subsidence. Through coincident analyses of these data sets, we identified many locations where bedrock, overburden, road fill materials and the roadway structure had been disrupted by mine-related subsidence processes. Subsequent to classifying locations as high risk for future failure, our geophysical interpretations were confirmed through exploratory drilling and probing.

Northeastern Section (39th Annual) and Southeastern Section (53rd Annual) Joint Meeting (March 25–27, 2004)
General Information for this Meeting
Session No. 68--Booth# 3
Remote Sensing/Geographic Info System (Posters)
Hilton McLean Tysons Corner: Ballrooms A and B
8:00 AM-12:00 PM, Saturday, March 27, 2004

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 36, No. 2, p. 137

© Copyright 2004 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.