| Northeastern Section (39th Annual) and Southeastern Section (53rd Annual) Joint Meeting (March 25–27, 2004) | |
| Paper No. 44-6 | |
| Presentation Time: 8:00 AM-12:00 PM | ||
THE EFFECTS OF TRADITIONAL AND CAFO AGRICULTURE ON SUMMER NITRATE LEVELS IN STREAM WATER | ||
|
DIESEL, Elizabeth, TEETERS, Evan, LEHMANN, David, and MATHUR, Ryan, Department of Geology, Juniata College, 1700 Moore Street, Huntingdon, PA 16652, dieseea1@juniata.edu Agricultural land use can add significant amounts of nutrients, including nitrates, to adjacent streams. Spruce Creek (central Pennsylvania) is a spring-fed stream with traditional livestock farms and the state's largest Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation (CAFO) along its banks. Warrior’s Mark Run is a major tributary to Spruce Creek and also runs through traditional agricultural land. To evaluate geographic sources of nutrients and analyze the impact of different scales of farming upon nitrate loading, we monitored a variety of physical and chemical parameters in these streams during the summer of 2003. Both CAFO and traditional agriculture contribute significant amount of nitrates to Spruce Creek. The highest observed concentrations of nitrates were from immediately downstream of the CAFO on 44% of the days we sampled. Although the overall trend was for nitrate values to decrease further downstream on these days, the pattern was complex. The overall volume of nitrates increased between each sample location, but increases in discharge also impacted nitrate concentration. On 56% of the days that we sampled, nitrate concentrations reached peak values in areas of traditional farming, not at the CAFO. Clearly, the impact of traditional agriculture—as well as the CAFO—upon nitrate loading is significant for this stream. Along Warrior’s Mark Run, the location of highest nitrate concentration was also variable, with highest values occurring evenly among three different locations at which there is significant streamside grazing. However, downstream of areas with significant streamside grazing, nitrate concentration decreased due to dilution. Although there is no CAFO along this stream, nitrate concentrations on Warrior’s Mark Run was comparable with those on Spruce Creek. There were a number of watershed-wide increases in nitrate concentrations typically associated with watershed-wide decreases in discharge. There were also increases in nitrate concentrations that occur only along Spruce Creek but not Warrior’s Mark Run and vice versa. Each of these increases in nitrate concentration is associated with a stream-specific decrease in discharge. However, decrease in discharge alone (i.e. concentration) cannot explain the magnitude of nitrate increases. | ||
|
Northeastern Section (39th Annual) and Southeastern Section (53rd Annual) Joint Meeting (March 25–27, 2004)
General Information for this Meeting | ||
| Session No. 44--Booth# 62 From the Mountains to the Sea: Fluvial Processes in the Eastern United States (Posters) Hilton McLean Tysons Corner: Ballrooms A and B 8:00 AM-12:00 PM, Friday, March 26, 2004 Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 36, No. 2, p. 108 | ||
© Copyright 2004 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions. | ||