| Northeastern Section (39th Annual) and Southeastern Section (53rd Annual) Joint Meeting (March 25–27, 2004) | |
| Paper No. 65-3 | |
| Presentation Time: 8:50 AM-9:10 AM | ||
RESTORATION APPROACHES FOR INCISED STREAMS | ||
|
HARMAN, William A., Buck Engineering, 8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 200, Cary, NC 27511, wharman@buckengineering.com. The majority of streams located in alluvial valleys of the eastern United States have been severely impacted from past and current land use practices. Starting in the mid 1700s, settlers cleared uplands and hill slopes for agricultural purposes. This caused extreme soil erosion from the uplands and subsequent valley aggradation. In most cases, the valleys aggraded 6 to 10 feet. In the early 1900s, soil conservation practices were implemented and upland erosion decreased. However, as soil conservation practices increases, so did channelization. Streams were straightened and moved over to the edge of the valley to maximize agricultural production. Channelization still continues in both agricultural and urban areas to maximize land availability and control flooding. Channelization typically increases stream power by increasing channel slope. This often causes the channel to incise, which leads to a series of vertical and lateral adjustments. These adjustments result in large quantities of bed and bank erosion, which destroys aquatic habitats and adjacent property. The purpose of this paper is to provide several case studies that use natural channel design approaches to restore morphological and biologic function to incised stream corridors. Examples will include cases where the original streambed elevation is reclaimed, thus re-connecting the stream to the original floodplain. This approach restores channel, floodplain, and wetland functions. Other cases will include the construction of a new floodplain at an elevation that is lower than the original floodplain. This approach restores channel and limited floodplain and wetland functions. Finally, cases will be provided where site constraints prevent raising the bed or building a new floodplain. In this case, in-stream structures and “benches” are used to create a stable step-pool channel. This approach restores channel function but does not restore floodplain or weltand functions. The case projects will include a variety of settings and site constraints including rural projects with no constraints to urban projects where restoration is limited by roads and utilities. | ||
|
Northeastern Section (39th Annual) and Southeastern Section (53rd Annual) Joint Meeting (March 25–27, 2004)
General Information for this Meeting | ||
| Session No. 65 Geomorphology of Stream Restoration and Natural Stream Design Hilton McLean Tysons Corner: Gunston A 8:00 AM-12:30 PM, Saturday, March 27, 2004 Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 36, No. 2, p. 143 | ||
© Copyright 2004 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions. | ||