Rocky Mountain (56th Annual) and Cordilleran (100th Annual) Joint Meeting (May 3–5, 2004)
Paper No. 2-8
Presentation Time: 11:00 AM-11:20 AM

A GEOCHEMICAL AND GEOCHRONOLOCIAL DATABASE FOR THE YELLOWSTONE PLATEAU VOLCANIC FIELD: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE ORIGIN OF POST-CALDERA BASALT AND THE FUTURE OF THE YELLOWSTONE MAGMATIC SYSTEM

SMITH, Eugene, Dept. Geoscience, Univ of Nevada, Las Vegas, 4505 South Maryland Parkway, Las Vegas, NV 89154-4010, gsmith@ccmail.nevada.edu and BENNETT, Kristeen, Department of Geoscience, Univ of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV 89154-4010

We have compiled a database of geochemical and geochronological data for basaltic rocks in the Yellowstone Park area that contains over 150 analyses and 20 dates. Our database includes samples from modern studies (1963-1995) in addition to 39 new chemical analyses and 9 40Ar/39Ar dates. Basaltic eruptions were coeval with the three Yellowstone caldera cycles (2.1-0.6 Ma) and may preserve the long-term record of their mantle source and any crustal interaction. The most recent basalts (<0.6 Ma) occur in the Norris-Mammoth corridor (NMC) north of the Yellowstone Caldera. Our first goal was to determine if the most recent basaltic volcanism within the NMC represents the initiation of a new caldera cycle or the dying phases of the last cycle. Isotopic ratios of the <0.6 Ma basalts suggest a relationship of eNd and 87Sr/86Sr to periods of caldera formation. 87Sr/86Sr changed from 0.707 to 0.703 and eNd from -7 to -0.4 at the inception of the first caldera cycle (2.1 Ma) suggesting injection of asthenospheric basalt into the crust. This injection may have triggered partial melting of the crust that ultimately led to generation of a rhyolitic magma chamber and caldera formation. The isotopic signatures of the <0.6 Ma basalts show both high and low values of 87Sr/86Sr and eNd; however, ages of the basalts are not precise enough to determine a chronology. There are two scenarios: 1) a new injection of basalt has occurred and a new caldera cycle has begun or; 2) the system is in a post-caldera phase. To determine which of these scenarios is correct, high precision 40Ar/39Ar dates must be determined for the basalts. This work is currently underway. Our second goal was to answer questions about the mantle source for the Yellowstone basalts and their degree of lithospheric contamination. Although, many previous studies suggested that the basalts were contaminated and provided little information about their mantle source, our new data and the re-plotting of older data shows that most of the basalt is similar to OIB in character. Many samples are similar to typical Great Basin OIB-type basalt in the Lunar Crater field of central Nevada that are interpreted as melts of the asthenospheric mantle. The Yellowstone database may provide important information about the source of basalts and the future of Yellowstone eruptions.

Rocky Mountain (56th Annual) and Cordilleran (100th Annual) Joint Meeting (May 3–5, 2004)
Session No. 2
Geochemical and Geochronological Databases and the Science That Can Be Done with Them
Boise Centre on the Grove: Douglas Fir
8:20 AM-12:00 PM, Monday, May 3, 2004

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 36, No. 4, p. 10

© Copyright 2004 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.