Rocky Mountain (56th Annual) and Cordilleran (100th Annual) Joint Meeting (May 3–5, 2004)
Paper No. 31-6
Presentation Time: 2:40 PM-3:00 PM

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY IMAGING USING CONTROLLED SOURCE ELECTROMAGNETICS FOR SUBSURFACE CHARACTERIZATION

MILLER, Carlyle R.1, ROUTH, Partha S.1, and DONALDSON, Paul R.2, (1) Dept. of Geosciences, Boise State University, Boise, ID 83725, carlylemiller@mail.boisestate.edu, (2) Center for Geophysical Investigation of the Shallow Subsurface, Boise State University, Boise, ID 83725

Controlled Source Audio-Frequency Magnetotellurics (CSAMT) is a frequency domain electromagnetic (EM) sounding technique. CSAMT typically uses a grounded horizontal electric dipole approximately one to two kilometers in length as a source. Measurements of electric and magnetic field components are made at stations located ideally at least four skin depths away from the transmitter to approximate plane wave characteristics of the source. Data are acquired in a broad band frequency range that are sampled logarithmically from 0.1 Hz to 10 kHz.

The usefulness of CSAMT soundings is to detect and map resistivity contrasts in the top two to three km of the Earth’s surface. Higher frequency data can be used to image shallow features and lower frequency data are sensitive to deeper structures. Some practical applications that CSAMT soundings have been used for include: mapping ground water resources; mineral/precious metals exploration; geothermal reservoir mapping and monitoring; petroleum exploration; and geotechnical investigations.

We have a 3D CSAMT data set consisting of phase and amplitude measurements of the Ex and Hy components of the electric and magnetic fields respectively. The survey area is approximately 3 X 5 km. Receiver stations are situated 50 meters apart along a total of 13 lines with 8 lines bearing approximately N60E and the remainder of the lines oriented orthogonal to these 8 lines. We use an unconstrained Gauss-Newton method with positivity to invert the data. Inversion results will consist of conductivity versus depth profiles beneath each receiver station. These 1D profiles will be combined into a 3D subsurface conductivity image. We will include our interpretation of the subsurface conductivity structure and quantify the uncertainties associated with this interpretation.

Rocky Mountain (56th Annual) and Cordilleran (100th Annual) Joint Meeting (May 3–5, 2004)
Session No. 31
Applications of Geophysics to Hydrogeology
Boise Centre on the Grove: Salmon River
1:00 PM-5:00 PM, Tuesday, May 4, 2004

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 36, No. 4, p. 76

© Copyright 2004 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.