2005 Salt Lake City Annual Meeting (October 16–19, 2005)
Paper No. 61-7
Presentation Time: 9:45 AM-10:00 AM

GEOARCHAEOLOGY OF THE KOSTENKI (UPPER PALEOLITHIC) LOCALITIES, DON VALLEY, RUSSIA

HOLLIDAY, Vance, Geosciences, The Univ of Arizona, Gould-Simpson Bldg, Tucson, AZ 85721, vthollid@email.arizona.edu and HOFFECKER, John F., Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, Univ of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0450

The Kostenki localities contain an array of Paleolithic open-air sites in a well-stratified context beneath the first and second terraces of the Don River. Discovered in 1879, the Kostenki sites have had a significant impact on Paleolithic archaeology in Eastern Europe. The stratigraphic continuity among these sites has long been recognized and has been a primary means of correlating the many occupation sequences. This paper presents the results of the first systematic study of site microstratigraphy, site chronology, and site formation processes at multiple localities on the second terrace. The strata are grouped into three units (bottom up): Unit 1, >50 ka, consists of coarse alluvium and colluvium, not visible in most sites and sections, overlain by fine-grained sediments. Unit 2 includes archaeological horizons sealed within two sets of thin lenses of silt, carbonate, chalk fragments, and organic-rich soils (the Lower Humic Beds and Upper Humic Beds) dating ~50-26 ka. Horizons buried in the lower part of Unit 2 contain Upper Paleolithic assemblages with prismatic blade cores, burins, end-scrapers, nonlithic implements, and personal ornaments, and a fragmentary specimen of possible figurative art. Other assemblages excavated from Unit 2 (e.g., Kostenki 12, Layer III) contain some Middle Paleolithic elements and lack nonlithic implements, ornaments, and possible art. Separating the Humic Beds is a volcanic ash lens identified as the Y5 tephra from the Campanian Ignimbrite eruption in Italy, dated elsewhere by Ar/Ar to ~39 ka. The Humic Beds appear to result from the complex interplay of soil formation, spring deposition, slope action, and other processes. The springs and seeps, which are present in the area today, emanated from the bedrock valley wall. This environment may account for the unusually high concentration of Upper Paleolithic sites in this part of Russia. Unit 3, <26 ka comprises redeposited loess with a buried soil (Gmelin Soil) overlain by a primary full-glacial loess with an associated Chernozem (Mollisol), forming the surface of the second terrace. The lower part of Unit 3 contains several rich Gravettian occupation levels that include large feature complexes. Younger Upper Paleolithic occupations (Epi-Gravettian) in Unit 3 include examples of mammoth-bone structures.

2005 Salt Lake City Annual Meeting (October 16–19, 2005)
General Information for this Meeting
Session No. 61
Archaeological Geology
Salt Palace Convention Center: 251 F
8:00 AM-12:00 PM, Monday, 17 October 2005

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 37, No. 7, p. 155

© Copyright 2005 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.