| 2005 Salt Lake City Annual Meeting (October 16–19, 2005) | |
| Paper No. 236-4 | |
| Presentation Time: 2:15 PM-2:30 PM | ||
INTERNAL STRUCTURE OF A ROCK GLACIER ON MOUNT MESTAS, CO, USING GROUND PENETRATING RADAR (GPR): A PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT | ||
|
JORGENSEN, William R.1, GIARDINO, John R.2, DEGENHARDT, John J.3, REGMI, Netra R.1, STOKES, Rebecca4, and VITEK, John D.5, (1) Geology and Geophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-1113, wjorgensen@neo.tamu.edu, (2) Geology and Geophysics and Geography, Texas A&M University, College Station, 77843-1113, (3) Office of Vice President for Research, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-1113, (4) Geology and Geophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, UT 77843-1113, (5) Geography, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-1113 The internal movement of rock glaciers has been a source of speculation by researchers for almost a hundred years. Various speculations have resulted in lively debates, but none grounded in evidence. The numerous models that have been proposed suggest movement as semi-solid body deformation, thin layer deformation, internal sliding along movement planes, basal sliding, or combinations of all these variouls mechanisms. But, real data from the interior of a rock glacier are scarce. Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) “looked” at the internal structure of various landforms, including rock glaciers. These looks into the interior have aided researchers in their quests to model and explain the internal deformation and movement. Nevertheless, one has to question how well does the GPR profile mirror the true internal structure of the rock glacier? Unfortumately, no one has compared a GPR profile with the actual internal structure. We used a rock glacier on Mount Mestas, that was excevated by the Colorado Highway Department in the 1960s as they searched for a borrow source for the constructuion of a new highway through La Veta Pass, as an opportunity to compare data from the GPR profile data with the interior structure. The ~4.5m wide, ~61 m long, and ~23 m deep excevation provides a window to compare GPR profile data with the actual internal structure. GPR data were collected using a PulseEKKOTM 100A system from Sensors & Software, Inc. at frequencies of 25 MHz and 50 MHz. Readings taken with the antennae parallel and perpendicular to the transect, at a step size of 1 m for the 25 MHz and 0.5 m for the 50 MHz antennae, allow analysis in 3-D. Preliminary analyses of these data suggest the internal structure as seen in the exposed trench. Enhanced processing and enhacement of data from the GPR profile should facilitate a closer match with the more subtle parts of the data profile. | ||
|
2005 Salt Lake City Annual Meeting (October 16–19, 2005)
General Information for this Meeting | ||
| Session No. 236--Booth# 0 Engineering Geology Salt Palace Convention Center: 251 D 1:30 PM-5:30 PM, Wednesday, 19 October 2005 Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 37, No. 7, p. 518 | ||
© Copyright 2005 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions. | ||