2005 Salt Lake City Annual Meeting (October 16–19, 2005)
Paper No. 42-1
Presentation Time: 1:35 PM-1:55 PM

TREATMENT OF ARSENIC USING PERMEABLE REACTIVE BARRIERS

BLOWES, David W.1, BAIN, Jeff G.1, SMYTH, David, MCGREGOR, Rick2, LUDWIG, Ralph3, WILKENS, John A.4, PTACEK, Carol J.1, and SPINK, Laura1, (1) Earth Sciences, Univ of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue W, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, blowes@sciborg.uwaterloo.ca, (2) XCG Consultants Ltd, Kitchener, ON N2H 6P4, Canada, (3) National Risk Management Research Laboratory, U.S. EPA, 919 Kerr Research Dr, Ada, OK 74820, (4) DuPont Company, Wilmington, DE 19880-0304

Arsenic is a common and widespread groundwater contaminant, which is derived from natural or anthropogenic sources. Arsenic commonly occurs in groundwater as an oxyanion, and is mobile under the conditions that prevail in most aquifers. Several permeable reactive barrier (PRB) systems have been installed for treatment of As-contaminated groundwater. The PRB sites include mine tailings impoundments, fertilizer manufacturing sites, thermal-electric power generation and transmission facilities and chemical production plants. A variety of reactive materials have been used in these installations. Some of the PRBs use reactive materials which include zero valent iron (ZVI) filings either with or without an organic carbon (OC) source such as wood chips or compost. Other installations contain basic oxygen furnace (BOF) slag, a byproduct of the steel refining process. Removal of As to below drinking water guideline concentrations has been observed in all of these PRBs. The PRBs range from a few meters in length to 600 m long. The mechanisms responsible for As removal in the PRBs containing ZVI and OC include microbially mediated sulfate reduction followed by metal (As) sulfide precipitation and secondarily by adsorption and coprecipitation on the ZVI corrosion surfaces. In the BOF slag barriers As is removed by adsorption and secondary mineral precipitation. Studies of the reactive material using selective chemical extractions, mineralogical examination and surface analytical techniques (e.g. SEM and synchrotron radiation based methods) are being conducted to determine the specific forms of the reaction products.

2005 Salt Lake City Annual Meeting (October 16–19, 2005)
General Information for this Meeting
Session No. 42
Innovative Monitoring and Modeling Techniques for Assessing the Performance of Passive Remediation Projects for Contaminated Water and Soil
Salt Palace Convention Center: 251 C
1:30 PM-5:30 PM, Sunday, 16 October 2005

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, Vol. 37, No. 7, p. 102

© Copyright 2005 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.